Results 261 to 270 of about 2,234,202 (287)

Open Peer Review

Serials Review, 2020
In this issue of Serials Review, the Balance Point column delves into issues surrounding peer review, paying particular attention to open peer review.
openaire   +1 more source

Open Peer Reviewers in Africa - Bias in Peer Review

TCC Africa, 2022
Joy Owango, Nicholas Outa
openaire   +1 more source

Survey on open peer review

2019
European Commission H2020 - OpenAIRE2020 - Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe 2020 (Grant agreement: 643410)
Ross-Hellauer, Tony, Deppe, Arvid, Schmidt, Birgit   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2023
Ariella R Korn
exaly  

Open Access, Open & Community Peer Review

This workshop examined economic, technical, and epistemic drivers of reform in scholarly communication for the humanities. Using live prompts and cases, participants contrasted APC-funded and legacy models with community-governed approaches, focusing on open and collaborative peer review, reviewer credit, and incentives.
openaire   +1 more source

Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model

Journal of Information Science, 2021
Mike Thelwall, Liz Allen, Eleanor-Rose Papas   +2 more
exaly  

Open Peer Review

Nursing Research, 2004
openaire   +2 more sources

Decentralizing science: Towards an interoperable open peer review ecosystem using blockchain

Information Processing and Management, 2021
Ámbar Tenorio-Fornés, Elena Pérez Tirador, Antonio Sánchez-Ruiz   +2 more
exaly  

Cancer risk among World Trade Center rescue and recovery workers: A review

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2022
Paolo Boffetta, Charles B Hall, Andrew C Todd   +2 more
exaly  

PEERE Research on peer review: Editors' opinions on open peer review

2017
Numerous studies are investigating peer review proces which is in the crisis: peer reviewers don't agree much, reviewers don't reliably select highly cited articles, peer review is not effective in detecting errors, rigorous peer review has not prevented the publication of fraudulent science in major journals, and according Wager and Jefferson study ...
openaire