Results 261 to 270 of about 668,202 (287)

Open Peer Review CMS Support

Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, 2017
Peer reviewing is a crucial step for quality assurance at scientific publishing. The task is time consuming and error-prone due to conflicts of interest, subjective opinions, and different education backgrounds. Open Peer Review (OPR) can solve many of said problems and is already applied to the journal publishing workflow.
Oliver Zendel 0001, Matthias Schörghuber, Michela Vignoli   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Problems with open participation in peer review

Scientometrics, 2017
In this letter, we study an open participation model of peer review in which potential reviewers choose whether to review a manuscript, at a cost, without a formal invitation. The outcome is a compromise among the reviewers’ recommendations. Here we show that the equilibrium number of reviewers in the public peer review is small, their recommendations ...
Jose A. García 0001, Rosa Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. Fdez-Valdivia   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Open Peer Reviewers in Africa - Bias in Peer Review

TCC Africa, 2022
Joy Owango, Nicholas Outa
openaire   +1 more source

Is open peer review the fairest system? No

BMJ, 2010
Trish Groves (doi:10.1136/bmj.c6424) argues that telling authors who has reviewed their paper has helped to make the process fairer, but Karim Khan is concerned that it stops reviewers from being completely ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Survey on open peer review

2019
European Commission H2020 - OpenAIRE2020 - Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe 2020 (Grant agreement: 643410)
Ross-Hellauer, Tony, Deppe, Arvid, Schmidt, Birgit   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Collaboration, peer review and open source software

Information Economics and Policy, 2004
Abstract Open source software development may be superior to proprietary development because the open source organizational form naturally minimizes transactions costs associated with privately distributed information. This manifests itself in the ability of open source communities to encourage critical peer review and the sharing of ideas.
openaire   +1 more source

Does the use of open, non-anonymous peer review in scholarly publishing introduce bias? Evidence from the F1000Research post-publication open peer review publishing model

Journal of Information Science, 2021
Mike Thelwall, Liz Allen, Eleanor-Rose Papas   +2 more
exaly  

Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review—A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists

PLoS ONE, 2021
Ksenija Baždarić, Iva Vrkić, Evgenia Arh   +2 more
exaly  

A validation study on the factors affecting the practice modes of open peer review

Scientometrics, 2022
Ying He, Kun Tian, Xiaoran Xu
exaly  

The case for open peer review

Medical Education, 2006
openaire   +2 more sources