When the Author Talks Back: Autonomous AI Agents, Rejection, and the Integrity of Peer Review. [PDF]
Wiechert K, Chapman JR, Wang JC.
europepmc +1 more source
Revisiting Reviewer Rewards: A Critical Commentary on "Incentivizing Peer Reviewers": Exploring Monetary and Nonmonetary Rewards. [PDF]
John A.
europepmc +1 more source
Editorial note: Long non-coding RNA as a potential diagnostic biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. [PDF]
PLOS One Editors.
europepmc +1 more source
Editorial Note: On the utilization of the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model to study substance use disorders: A scoping review protocol. [PDF]
PLOS One Editors.
europepmc +1 more source
Correction: Making scientific publishing more balanced and reversing the current dangerous drift to better support global environmental conservation and planetary health. [PDF]
Guidetti P +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Related searches:
In this issue of Serials Review, the Balance Point column delves into issues surrounding peer review, paying particular attention to open peer review.
Christine L Ferguson
exaly +2 more sources
Challenges to open peer review
Online Information Review, 2019PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess what the challenges to open peer review (OPR) are, relative to traditional peer review (TPR).Design/methodology/approachBy examining select issues within peer review, more broadly, and challenges within TPR, the effectiveness of OPR is questioned.FindingsAlthough OPR brings an aspect of transparency, by ...
openaire +1 more source

