Results 21 to 30 of about 2,192,791 (336)
Peer review and ‘openness’ [PDF]
Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2009 The Editor states that publishing peer reviewers’ names is ‘a bold step in improving the transparency’ of the peer-review process, and is important in achieving a more open process.1 While one may respect Dr Abbassi's opinion in this regard, it appears to be an opinion held without objective supporting data.
openaire +2 more sources
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 2010 The traditional forms of scientific publishing and peer review do not live up to the demands of efficient communication and quality assurance in today's highly diverse and rapidly evolving world of science.
Ulrich Poschl
doaj +1 more source
Revealing Reviewers’ Identities as Part of Open Peer Review and Analysis of the Review Reports
Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research Libraries, 2020 This research article is aimed at comparing review reports, in which the identity of the reviewers is revealed to the authors of the papers, with those where the reviewers decided to remain anonymous.
Cezary Bolek +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020 Background Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the ...
Lonni Besançon +4 more
doaj +1 more source
The Effect of Open Peer Review on Reviewers’ Behavior: a Scope Review [PDF]
Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 2023 The role of article publishing in academic and professional promotion is unprecedentedly increasing worldwide and researchers demand more transparency in the process of reviewing articles.
Nadia Hadji-Azizi
doaj +1 more source
An Open Science Peer Review Oath [PDF]
F1000Research, 2015 One of the foundations of the scientific method is to be able to reproduce experiments and corroborate the results of research that has been done before. However, with the increasing complexities of new technologies and techniques, coupled with the specialisation of experiments, reproducing research findings has become a growing challenge.
Jelena Aleksic +17 more
openaire +6 more sources
Moving peer review transparency from process to praxis
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2019 Scholarly publications often work to provide transparency of peer-review processes, posting policy information to their websites as suggested by the Committee on Publication Ethics’ (COPE) 'Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Publishing'. Yet
Emily Ford
doaj +1 more source
Exploring the SCOAP3 model for high energy physics : a new innovation in open access [PDF]
, 2009 A new model for funding high energy physics (HEP) journals has emerged and is drawing concerted interest and questions from the library community—SCOAP3, the Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access in Particle Physics Publishing....This initiative ...
Douglas, Kimberly
core +1 more source
"Open the Gates Mek We Repatriate": Caribbean slavery, constructivism, and hermeneutic tensions [PDF]
, 2014 This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edit version of an article published in International Theory. The definitive publisher-authenticated version: Shilliam, Robbie.
Shilliam, R
core +1 more source
Opening Review in LIS Journals: A Status Report
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 2016 INTRODUCTION Peer-review practices in scholarly publishing are changing. Digital publishing mechanisms allow for open peer review, a peer review process that discloses author and reviewer identities to one another.
Emily Ford
doaj +2 more sources