Results 141 to 150 of about 23,949,833 (176)

Brain‐Computer Interface Training Fosters Perceptual Skills to Detect Errors

Advanced Science, EarlyView.
Accurate perception of visuomotor errors underpins motor precision and learning, yet conventional behavioral training fails to improve sensitivity to subtle errors. Real‐time EEG‐based brain‐computer interface feedback targeting the error positivity component enhances perceptual learning of small errors.
Deland H. Liu, Fumiaki Iwane, Minsu Zhang, Leonardo G. Cohen, José del R. Millán   +4 more
wiley   +1 more source

Unveiling a Hidden Conversion Pathway in CoSe2 Anodes via Rationally Designed CNT‐Interwoven Hollow Carbon Microclusters for High‐Performance Potassium‐Ion Batteries

Advanced Science, EarlyView.
A rational architectural design of hierarchical, CNT‐interwoven hollow carbon microclusters unlocks and stabilizes a unique monoclinic Co3Se4‐mediated conversion–insertion pathway for potassium storage. This structural confinement effectively guides the reaction kinetics and accommodates severe mechanical strain.
Ho Rim Kim, Seohyeon Jang, Hong Geun Oh, Jaewoo Lee, Jihun Yeom, Daiha Shin, Jiung Cho, Inho Nam, Seung‐Keun Park   +8 more
wiley   +1 more source

A Portable Soft Robotic Glove with Fully Functional Thumb Assistance for Complex Dexterous Fine Motor Skills

Advanced Science, EarlyView.
A portable, sensorized, and controlled dexterous thumb‐enhanced glove helps stroke survivors swipe phones, twist caps, and perform other tasks. It is based on a powerful continuously, segmented origami dual chamber actuator to achieve active thumb CMC and MCP joint assistance and passively extend the IP joint.
Disheng Xie, Zhen Wang, Zhongping Ye, Minghao Liu, Xiangqian Shi, Shuk Fan Tong, Jianbin Liu, Chuanbin Mao, Thomas W. Leung, Haitao Liu, Raymond Kai‐yu Tong   +10 more
wiley   +1 more source

A systematic review of paper-based versus computer-based testing in engineering and computing education

2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2022
In the past two decades, there has been a considerable increase in use of computer-based exams. Currently there is a lack of comprehensive understanding about equivalence between paper-based and computer-based exams in engineering and computing education.
Andrew Valentine, Paul Vrbik, Richard Thomas 0002   +2 more
openaire   +5 more sources

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Computer Versus Paper—Does It Make Any Difference in Test Performance?

Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 2015
CONSTRUCT: In this study, we examine the differences in test performance between the paper-based and the computer-based version of the Berlin formative Progress Test. In this context it is the first study that allows controlling for students' prior performance.Computer-based tests make possible a more efficient examination procedure for test ...
Katrin Schüttpelz-Brauns
exaly   +3 more sources

Paper-based versus computer-based testing in engineering education

IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference, 2010
Using computers for assessment can provide several benefits for educators and test-takers. However, in the literature, there is no consensus on the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based test environments. Accordingly, more evidences are needed especially for the engineering education.
Seniz Ozalp-Yaman, Nergiz E. Cagiltay
core   +4 more sources

Paper–based versus computer–based assessment: key factors associated with the test mode effect

British Journal of Educational Technology, 2002
This investigation seeks to confirm several key factors in computer–based versus paper–based assessment. Based on earlier research, the factors considered here include content familiarity, computer familiarity, competitiveness, and gender. Following classroom instruction, freshman business undergraduates (N = 105) were randomly assigned to either a ...
Roy Clariana
exaly   +2 more sources

Computer Versus Paper Testing in Precollege Economics

The Journal of Economic Education, 2011
Interest is growing at the precollege level in computer testing (CT) instead of paper-and-pencil testing (PT) for subjects in the school curriculum, including economics. Before economic educators adopt CT, a better understanding of its likely effects on test-taking behavior and performance compared with PT is needed. Using two volunteer student samples
Roger B. Butters, William B. Walstad
openaire   +1 more source

Testing Computer Programming Skills—Paper and Pencil versus a Computer and Compiler

Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2003
Having students write programs is the best method to test students programming ability. Most of the time these tests are administered via paper and pencil whereas the homework is completed using a computer and compiler. So why not use a computer and compiler to administer programming tests?
Stacie Gomm, Sandie Hailey Waters, Jui Feng   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Computer-based versus paper-based testing: Investigating testing mode with cognitive load and scratch paper use

Computers in Human Behavior, 2017
Abstract The aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between testing mode (taking a test on computer versus paper) and two other factors: (1) cognitive load and (2) scratch paper use in an undergraduate general chemistry class setting.
Anna Agripina Prisacari, Jared Danielson
openaire   +2 more sources