Results 161 to 170 of about 2,725,232 (305)

Peer victimization and peer sexual harassment across early adolescence: Branches from the same tree or free-standing constructs? [PDF]

J Res Adolesc
Gattario KH, Valik A, Lunde C, Skoog T, Jaf D.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

PARP inhibitors elicit distinct transcriptional programs in homologous recombination competent castration‐resistant prostate cancer

Molecular Oncology, EarlyView.
PARP inhibitors are used to treat a small subset of prostate cancer patients. These studies reveal that PARP1 activity and expression are different between European American and African American prostate cancer tissue samples. Additionally, different PARP inhibitors cause unique and overlapping transcriptional changes, notably, p53 pathway upregulation.
Moriah L. Cunningham, Jasibel Vasquez‐Gonzalez, Samantha M. Barnada, Salome Tchotorlishvili, Latese Jones, Ryan Maguire, Genevieve Lewis, Kinza Rizwan, Jenny Deng, Salma Koachar, Drithi Patel, Hailey Shankle, Tessa Mulders, Namra Ajmal, Charalambos Solomides, Emad S. Alnemri, Teresa F. Alnemri, Ayesha A. Shafi, Leonard G. Gomella, Wm Kevin Kelly, Steven B. McMahon, Matthew J. Schiewer   +21 more
wiley   +1 more source

Fishing reviewing: A threat to research integrity and credibility. [PDF]

World J Methodol
Al-Beltagi M.
europepmc   +1 more source

Single‐cell transcriptomics redefines focal neuroendocrine differentiation as a distinct prostate cancer pathology

Molecular Oncology, EarlyView.
Single‐cell transcriptomics of prostate cancer patient‐derived xenografts reveals distinct features of neuroendocrine (NE) subtypes. Tumours with focal NE differentiation (NED) share transcriptional programmes with adenocarcinoma, differing from large and small cell neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Our work defines the molecular landscape of NEPC,
Rosalia Quezada Urban, Shivakumar Keerthikumar, Ashlee Clark, Hong Wang, Belinda Phipson, Andrew Bakshi, Andrew Ryan, Heather Thorne, Renea A. Taylor, Mitchell G. Lawrence, Gail P. Risbridger, Roxanne Toivanen, David L. Goode   +12 more
wiley   +1 more source

Analysis of Retracted Publications on Methotrexate. [PDF]

J Korean Med Sci
Kocyigit BF, Zhakipbekov K, Yessirkepov M.   +2 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Bridging the gap: Multi‐stakeholder perspectives of molecular diagnostics in oncology

Molecular Oncology, EarlyView.
Although molecular diagnostics is transforming cancer care, implementing novel technologies remains challenging. This study identifies unmet needs and technology requirements through a two‐step stakeholder involvement. Liquid biopsies for monitoring applications and predictive biomarker testing emerge as key unmet needs. Technology requirements vary by
Jorine Arnouts, Senada Koljenović, Elise Daems, Karolien De Wael, Marc Peeters, Léon C. van Kempen, Greetje Vanhoutte, Karen Zwaenepoel, Timon Vandamme   +8 more
wiley   +1 more source

Comentários sobre artigo de Araújo: os critérios para revisão e publicação de artigos são evidentes?

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Paulo Roberto Benchimol-Barbosa
doaj   +1 more source

Publication Literacy: Editors’ Advice on the Successful Submission and Acceptance of a Journal Article

Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi
This article explores the growing practice of publication literacy and presents guidelines on how publication literacy can develop both writing skills and managing article submissions to a journal.
Laetus Lategan, Cecilé Swart, Desere Kokt   +2 more
doaj  

Advancing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implementation in Canada: a scoping review protocol of programmes, practices and policies. [PDF]

BMJ Open
Chakraborty D, Djiadeu P, Ziegler C, Chabikuli A, Ifeanacho E, Awoliyi M, Zuta H, Djuidje De Pandja G, Ajiboye O, Ajiboye O, Nelson LE, Rourke SB, Ajiboye W.   +12 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Contemporary Peer Code Review in Research Software

, 2019
Contemporary peer code review is a lightweight, asynchronous method for ensuring high-quality code. Research results in traditional software engineering and open-source software engineering have shown the clear benefits peer code review provides to software quality and maintainability. The quality increase results from the focused review of the code to
openaire   +1 more source