Results 251 to 260 of about 2,877,555 (301)

Decentralized Peer-Review Research Solution

2021 12th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 2021
The current conference and journal management systems for scientific research are centralized and suffer from single-point-of-failures. Moreover, these systems lack transparency and require their participants to trust a third-party. In this paper, we design a decentralized alternative for conference and journal management systems by leveraging ...
Lalith Medury, Siddhartha Ghosh
openaire   +1 more source

Peer Reviewed: Creating Multidisciplinary Research Opportunities

Environmental Science & Technology, 1999
A unifying framework model helps researchers to address the complexities of environmental problems.
W A, Suk, B E, Anderson, C L, Thompson, D A, Bennett, D C, Vandermeer   +4 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Peer review of nursing research proposals

American Journal of Critical Care, 1995
The grant review process that operationalizes peer review for the critique, scoring, approval, and selection of research grants for funding may intimidate a novice reviewer. This article describes the peer review panel and process of grant review, specifies the role and responsibilities of the reviewer in the review session, and presents considerations
R D, Lindquist, M F, Tracy, D, Treat-Jacobson   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Peer Review of Research Abstracts

Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1988
Application of a rating theory model to reviews of abstracts submitted to an international research conference resulted in good fit with the data and detection of significant interreviewer differences in reviewer stringency. Computation of calibrated ratings (i.e., those from which reviewer differences had been removed) permitted selection of abstracts
Carolyn L. Cason, Gerald J. Cason, Alice R. Redland   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Peer Review and Research Impact

Customer Needs and Solutions, 2015
In academia, citations received by articles are a critical metric for measuring research impact. An important aspect of publishing in academia is the ability of the authors to navigate the review process, and despite its critical role, very little is known about how the review process may impact the research impact of an article.
Girish Mallapragada, Nandini Lahiri, Atul Nerkar   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed

Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2004
Zusammenfassung Der Aufsatz bietet einen Überblick über die Hauptfelder der Peer Review Forschung, also jenes Segments der Wissenschaftsforschung, das sich mit dem zentralen Evaluationsverfahren wissenschaftlicher Praxis befasst.
openaire   +1 more source

Peer review: journal articles versus research proposals

Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2004
The focus of this Theme Section is peer review of journal manuscripts versus that of research proposals, both of which can be intellectually rewarding. A number of well-established scientists who were invited for comments underlined that whereas a manuscript submitted to a journal is a completed piece of work, suitable to be peer reviewed using well ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Scientific research: demystifying peer review

Research Evaluation, 1996
The commitment to peer review as a basis for judging science is deeply rooted in academic culture, and has been largely accepted in the UK's £2 billion annual public funding of science. Yet the criteria are insufficiently transparent for public accountability. In practice peer review focuses on three concerns. ‘Fitness for purpose’ relates to the means
openaire   +2 more sources