Results 261 to 270 of about 2,889,538 (305)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Peer Review and Research Impact

Customer Needs and Solutions, 2015
In academia, citations received by articles are a critical metric for measuring research impact. An important aspect of publishing in academia is the ability of the authors to navigate the review process, and despite its critical role, very little is known about how the review process may impact the research impact of an article.
Girish Mallapragada   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Peer Review Verfahren auf dem Prüfstand / Peer Review Research – Reviewed

Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 2004
Zusammenfassung Der Aufsatz bietet einen Überblick über die Hauptfelder der Peer Review Forschung, also jenes Segments der Wissenschaftsforschung, das sich mit dem zentralen Evaluationsverfahren wissenschaftlicher Praxis befasst.
openaire   +1 more source

Peer review: journal articles versus research proposals

Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2004
The focus of this Theme Section is peer review of journal manuscripts versus that of research proposals, both of which can be intellectually rewarding. A number of well-established scientists who were invited for comments underlined that whereas a manuscript submitted to a journal is a completed piece of work, suitable to be peer reviewed using well ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Scientific research: demystifying peer review

Research Evaluation, 1996
The commitment to peer review as a basis for judging science is deeply rooted in academic culture, and has been largely accepted in the UK's £2 billion annual public funding of science. Yet the criteria are insufficiently transparent for public accountability. In practice peer review focuses on three concerns. ‘Fitness for purpose’ relates to the means
openaire   +2 more sources

Research Into Editorial Peer Review

American Journal of Diseases of Children, 1988
Any editor rapidly learns that the authors who submit manuscripts have widely differing ideas about the process of selecting articles for publication. He also soon discovers that the readers have an even wider range of views on the subject. Though trained to take a neutral and objective position when judging manuscripts, when it comes to journal ...
openaire   +1 more source

Malice's wonderland: Research funding and peer review

Journal of Neurobiology, 1983
AbstractThe players all played at once, without waiting for turns, quarreling all the while and fighting for the hedgehogs; and in a very short time the queen was in a furious passion and went stamping about, and shouting “off with his head” or “off with her head,” about once a minute.Alice began to feel very uneasy: to be sure she had not as yet had ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Research on Peer Review

2023
Kimberly A. Lowe   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source

Assessing peer review for research

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 1981
R H, Davis, C W, Gibley
openaire   +2 more sources

Rendering Research (Peer-reviewed Newspaper)

2022
This publication serves as a record of the workshop "Rendering Research", organized jointly by Digital Aesthetics Research Centre, Aarhus University and Centre for the Study of the Networked Image, London South Bank University – a collective exploration of how we make our research public, and the forms it can take through speedy hands-on making.
openaire   +1 more source

PEERE Research on peer review: Editors' opinions on open peer review

2017
Numerous studies are investigating peer review proces which is in the crisis: peer reviewers don't agree much, reviewers don't reliably select highly cited articles, peer review is not effective in detecting errors, rigorous peer review has not prevented the publication of fraudulent science in major journals, and according Wager and Jefferson study ...
openaire  

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy