Results 271 to 280 of about 3,137,448 (307)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Scientific research: demystifying peer review
Research Evaluation, 1996The commitment to peer review as a basis for judging science is deeply rooted in academic culture, and has been largely accepted in the UK's £2 billion annual public funding of science. Yet the criteria are insufficiently transparent for public accountability. In practice peer review focuses on three concerns. ‘Fitness for purpose’ relates to the means
openaire +3 more sources
Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals
Science, Technology, & Human Values, 1985The peer review of research results submitted for journal publication raises elementary issues of fairness and reliability.' Peer review of proposals to perform research in the future, however, is even more problematic. For many reasons, judging untested ideas is inherently more uncertain than evaluating completed work.
Alan L. Porter, Frederick A. Rossini
openaire +2 more sources
An update on peer review and research data [PDF]
Learned Publishing, 2016 Key points Technological advances in the amounts of data that researchers generate and use are causing problems for the scholarly communication system. How, when and by whom should quality checks and assurance be integrated into this – already overloaded – ecosystem?
openaire +1 more source
Peer Reviewed: Creating Multidisciplinary Research Opportunities
Environmental Science & Technology, 1999A unifying framework model helps researchers to address the complexities of environmental problems.
William A. Suk +4 more
openaire +3 more sources
Rigour in research and peer-review: a reply
Construction Management and Economics, 1998Discussion and constructive criticism of research work when based on facts and sound scientific arguments are good practice which not only enrich research work but potentially improve the findings. For these reasons, they should be encouraged. However, when discussions are put forward out of ignorance for the sake of criticism to attack the integrity ...
Sabah Alkass +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Peer review and the changing research record
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1990Misrepresentation in research is clearly a problem today. In the environment of big science, with accelerating competition, increased rewards for discovery and uncertainties of long-range outcome, two important checks on quality control—peer review and the replication of results—are more difficult to accomplish effectively.
Susan Crawford, Loretta Stucki
openaire +2 more sources
Assessing peer review for research
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 1981Gibley Cw, Davis Rh
openaire +3 more sources
Malice's wonderland: Research funding and peer review
Journal of Neurobiology, 1983AbstractThe players all played at once, without waiting for turns, quarreling all the while and fighting for the hedgehogs; and in a very short time the queen was in a furious passion and went stamping about, and shouting “off with his head” or “off with her head,” about once a minute.Alice began to feel very uneasy: to be sure she had not as yet had ...
openaire +3 more sources
An overview of real‐world data sources for oncology and considerations for research
Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2022Lynne T Penberthy +2 more
exaly