Results 101 to 110 of about 12,310,539 (395)
Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2018 BACKGROUND: Peer review is used to determine what research is funded and published, yet little is known about its effectiveness, and it is suspected that there may be biases.
R. Tamblyn +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.Glutaredoxin (Grx) 3 proteins contain a thioredoxin domain and one to three class II Grx domains. These proteins play a crucial role in iron homeostasis in eukaryotic cells. In human Grx3, at least one of the two Grx domains, together with the thioredoxin domain, is essential for its function in iron metabolism.
Laura Magdalena Jordt +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Peer review: types, pitfalls and controversies
Bangladesh Journal of BioethicsPeer review has been adopted by most journals to evaluate the quality of submitted manuscripts, for which peer reviewers aim to provide a critical, independent and unbiased assessment. Peer review is ever evolving, with no single peer review system being
Wilfred C. G. Peh
doaj +1 more source
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2014 Peer review is widely accepted as the hallmark of scholarly, scientific publication. It helps journal editors determine whether research conclusions are justified and “new,” gives them an idea of the potential or actual significance of a work1 and adds a
José Florencio F. Lapeña
doaj +1 more source
Improving Assessment on MOOCs Through Peer Identification and Aligned Incentives [PDF]
, 2017 Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) use peer assessment to grade open ended questions at scale, allowing students to provide feedback. Relative to teacher based grading, peer assessment on MOOCs traditionally delivers lower quality feedback and fewer learner interactions.
arxiv +1 more source
Assisting Decision Making in Scholarly Peer Review: A Preference Learning Perspective [PDF]
arXiv, 2021 Peer review is the primary means of quality control in academia; as an outcome of a peer review process, program and area chairs make acceptance decisions for each paper based on the review reports and scores they received. Quality of scientific work is multi-faceted; coupled with the subjectivity of reviewing, this makes final decision making ...
arxiv
Dynamics of poles with position-dependent strengths and its optical analogues [PDF]
, 2010 The dynamics of point vortices is generalized in two ways: first by making the strengths complex, which allows for sources and sinks in superposition with the usual vortices, second by making them functions of position.
Aref +11 more
core +2 more sources
FEBS Letters, EarlyView.Dimeric pyruvate formate‐lyase cleaves pyruvate using a radical‐based mechanism. G734 serves as a radical storage location, and the radical is transferred to the catalytic C419 residue. Mutation of the C418‐C419 pair causes loss of enzyme activity, but does not impede radical introduction onto G734. Therefore, cis‐ but not trans‐radical transfer occurs
Michelle Kammel +2 more
wiley +1 more source
Systematic Review of Approaches to Improve Peer Assessment at Scale [PDF]
arXiv, 2020 Peer Assessment is a task of analysis and commenting on student's writing by peers, is core of all educational components both in campus and in MOOC's. However, with the sheer scale of MOOC's & its inherent personalised open ended learning, automatic grading and tools assisting grading at scale is highly important.
arxiv
Peer Review Certifies Quality and Innovation in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. [PDF]
, 2017 Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is an established voice of the discipline, a trusted source of new knowledge showcasing discovery, translation, and application of novel therapeutic paradigms to advance the management of patients and ...
Terzic, Andre M., Waldman, Scott A.
core +2 more sources