Results 11 to 20 of about 12,310,539 (395)
Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF [PDF]
Palgrave communications (2019), 5(1), 29, 2018 When performing a national research assessment, some countries rely on citation metrics whereas others, such as the UK, primarily use peer review. In the influential Metric Tide report, a low agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) was found. However, earlier studies observed much higher agreement between
Traag, Vincent, Waltman, Ludo
arxiv +9 more sources
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance glyphosate
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023 The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the Assessment Group on Glyphosate (AGG), consisting of the competent authorities of France, the Netherlands, Sweden and Hungary, acting jointly as ...
F. Álvarez +35 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023 Background The emergence of systems based on large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT has created a range of discussions in scholarly circles.
Mohammad Hosseini, S. Horbach
semanticscholar +1 more source
Interactive Learning Environments, 2023 This study adopted a pre-test–post-test design to explore gender differences in argumentative essay writing and peer review performance and uptake within a higher education context.
O. Noroozi +6 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022 Significance Peer review is vital for research validation, but may be affected by “status bias,” the unequal treatment of papers written by prominent and less-well-known authors.
Juergen Huber +5 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 2012 Peer review seems to have had its origins in 18th century England to combat plagiarism. But today, the objectives of peer review are to provide evaluations of the quality of scientific or editorial material submitted. Peer review provides a check on the validity of manuscripts and sets standards for scientific merit.
Robert P. Ferguson, Stephanie M. Griffin
openaire +4 more sources
Is the future of peer review automated?
BMC Research Notes, 2022 The rising rate of preprints and publications, combined with persistent inadequate reporting practices and problems with study design and execution, have strained the traditional peer review system.
Robert Schulz +15 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
BMC Primary Care, 2023 Background Although previous studies have reported general inexperience with the Epley manoeuvre (EM) among general physicians, no report has evaluated the effect of EM on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary care by using point ...
Yusuke Saishoji +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews
PLoS ONE, 2022 Peer Review is at the heart of scholarly communications and the cornerstone of scientific publishing. However, academia often criticizes the peer review system as non-transparent, biased, arbitrary, a flawed process at the heart of science, leading to ...
Tirthankar Ghosal +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source