Results 11 to 20 of about 12,957,925 (392)
The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future
British Journal of Biomedical ScienceThe peer review process is a fundamental aspect of modern scientific paper publishing, underpinning essential quality control. First conceptualised in the 1700s, it is an iterative process that aims to elevate scientific literature to the highest ...
John A. Drozdz, Michael R. Ladomery
doaj +2 more sources
Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives, 2012 Peer review seems to have had its origins in 18th century England to combat plagiarism. But today, the objectives of peer review are to provide evaluations of the quality of scientific or editorial material submitted. Peer review provides a check on the validity of manuscripts and sets standards for scientific merit.
Robert P. Ferguson, Stephanie M. Griffin
openaire +6 more sources
NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review [PDF]
Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2022 Peer review constitutes a core component of scholarly publishing; yet it demands substantial expertise and training, and is susceptible to errors and biases.
Nils Dycke +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance glyphosate
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023 The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the Assessment Group on Glyphosate (AGG), consisting of the competent authorities of France, the Netherlands, Sweden and Hungary, acting jointly as ...
F. Álvarez +35 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Transparency versus anonymity: which is better to eliminate bias in peer review?
Insights: The UKSG Journal, 2022 Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process. When conducted properly by dedicated and competent reviewers, it helps to safeguard the quality, validity, authority and rigour of academic work.
Faye Holst, Kim Eggleton, Simon Harris
doaj +1 more source
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023 Background The emergence of systems based on large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT has created a range of discussions in scholarly circles.
Mohammad Hosseini, S. Horbach
semanticscholar +1 more source
Interactive Learning Environments, 2023 This study adopted a pre-test–post-test design to explore gender differences in argumentative essay writing and peer review performance and uptake within a higher education context.
O. Noroozi +6 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review
Learned Publishing, 2023 Technology is being developed to support the peer review processes of journals, conferences, funders, universities, and national research evaluations. This literature and software summary discusses the partial or complete automation of several publishing‐
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall
semanticscholar +1 more source
BMC Primary Care, 2023 Background Although previous studies have reported general inexperience with the Epley manoeuvre (EM) among general physicians, no report has evaluated the effect of EM on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) in primary care by using point ...
Yusuke Saishoji +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023 Background Differential participation and success in grant applications may contribute to women’s lesser representation in the sciences. This study’s objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to address the question of gender ...
Karen B. Schmaling, Stephen A. Gallo
doaj +1 more source