Results 11 to 20 of about 3,030,229 (330)

Preguntas frecuentes sobre el OPRM [PDF]

, 2016
This work was funded by OpenAIRE 2020, EU-Horizon2020 Grant ID 643410.Peer ...
Open Peer Review Module Consortium
core   +1 more source

Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF [PDF]

, 2019
When performing a national research assessment, some countries rely on citation metrics whereas others, such as the UK, primarily use peer review. In the influential Metric Tide report, a low agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK Research ...
Traag, Vincent, Waltman, Ludo
core   +5 more sources

Student experiences of peer review marking of team projects [PDF]

, 2007
Peer review of students is a partial response to critics of group work who cite drawbacks of "free riders" and de-motivation. It is often used to motivate and focus students on their own development within a group work setting.
Coates, D, Palermo, O, Pond, K
core   +2 more sources

Review the ‘peer review’ [PDF]

Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2017
Peer review has been the main form of appraisal of scientific knowledge for over a century. In essence, this process involves the evaluation of a scientific finding by independent experts prior to its dissemination to the scientific community, in an attempt to ensure that both the research and conclusions meet the necessary standards regarding quality,
Christophe Blockeel, Christophe Blockeel, Juan A. Garcia-Velasco, Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Nikolaos P. Polyzos, Herman Tournaye   +5 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review

Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023
Background There is a power imbalance between authors and reviewers in single-blind peer review. We explored how switching from single-blind to double-blind peer review affected 1) the willingness of experts to review, 2) their publication ...
Piitu Parmanne, Joonas Laajava, Noora Järvinen, Terttu Harju, Mauri Marttunen, Pertti Saloheimo   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation

JLIS.it, 2022
The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of which are discussed by the authors of the articles of this issue. Is peer review really peer?
Mauro Guerrini, Andrea Capaccioni, Rossana Morriello, Editorial Board   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer education and peer support in prisons. [PDF]

, 2015
BACKGROUND: Prisoners experience significantly worse health than the general population. This review examines the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer interventions in prison settings.
A Bryan, A Liebling, A Rogers, A Stant, Anne-Marie Bagnall, B Davies, B Hall, C Ashton, C Rennie, C Seale, C Sirdifield, C Sirdifield, C Walrath, C-L Dennis, CE Munoz-Plaza, Centre for Reviews Dissemination. Systematic Reviews, Claire Hulme, D Jolliffe, D Stewart, D Zucker, Department of Health, Department of Health, DP Scott, E Player, EH Goldstein, F Harris, F Syed, FW Maull, G Betts-Symond, G Chen, G Hunter, G Hunter, G Junker, Gary Raine, GJ Devilly, I Boyce, J Hoover, J Jacobson, J Levenson, J Richman, J Senior, J South, J South, J Thomas, J Thomas, JA Cichowlas, James Woodall, Jane South, K Blanchette, K Collica, K Collica, K Edgar, K Emmons, K Milburn, KA Dolan, Karen Vinall-Collier, Karina Kinsella, KC Eamon, KN Wright, KN Wright, L Finnegan, L Patel, L Snow, L Snow, Linda Harris, Ministry of Justice, MRK Boothby, MS Daigle, MW Ross, N Schlapman, N Wright, Nat MJ Wright, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NHS England, NOM Service, O Grinstead, OA Grinstead, Prison Reform Trust, R Boisvert, R Dhaliwal, R Huggins, R MacGowan, R Rees, R Walmsley, R Walmsley, R Watson, Rachael Dixey, RG Vaz, S Brooker, S Fazel, S Ginn, S Ginn, S MacAskill, S O’Hagan, S Ramsey, S Sifunda, S Sifunda, S Taylor, S Zhang, SA Lewin, Social Exclusion Unit, SS Martin, T Miller, VE Bowman, W Schinkel, W Stewart   +105 more
core   +1 more source

Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis [PDF]

, 2018
Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer review and bibliometric indicators, two different method- ologies which are sometimes combined.
A Baccini, AG Smith, CJ Lee, D Hicks, D Sayer, DL Anderson, GB Emerson, J Mingers, M Hojat, O Mryglod, R Smith, SE Hug   +11 more
core   +2 more sources

Conserving California fish … Extension approaches applied to contentious marine-fisheries management issues

California Agriculture, 2004
We describe three creative collaborations between the California Sea Grant Extension Program (SGEP), the California Department of Fish and Game, the fishing industry and university researchers to improve marine fisheries management in ...
Christopher Dewees, Kristen Sortais, William S. Leet   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Data journals: types of peer review, review criteria, and editorial committee members’ positions [PDF]

Science Editing, 2020
Purpose This study analyzed the peer review systems, criteria, and editorial committee structures of data journals, aiming to determine the current state of data peer review and to offer suggestions.
Sunkyung Seo, Jihyun Kim
doaj   +1 more source