Results 11 to 20 of about 994,354 (266)
Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023 Background There is a power imbalance between authors and reviewers in single-blind peer review. We explored how switching from single-blind to double-blind peer review affected 1) the willingness of experts to review, 2) their publication ...
Piitu Parmanne +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Systematic analysis of agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK REF [PDF]
Palgrave communications (2019), 5(1), 29, 2018 When performing a national research assessment, some countries rely on citation metrics whereas others, such as the UK, primarily use peer review. In the influential Metric Tide report, a low agreement between metrics and peer review in the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) was found. However, earlier studies observed much higher agreement between
arxiv +1 more source
MOPRD: A multidisciplinary open peer review dataset [PDF]
Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 35, Issue 34, pp.
24191-24206 (2023), 2022 Open peer review is a growing trend in academic publications. Public access to peer review data can benefit both the academic and publishing communities. It also serves as a great support to studies on review comment generation and further to the realization of automated scholarly paper review.
arxiv +1 more source
Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation
JLIS.it, 2022 The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of which are discussed by the authors of the articles of this issue. Is peer review really peer?
Mauro Guerrini +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Data journals: types of peer review, review criteria, and editorial committee members’ positions [PDF]
Science Editing, 2020 Purpose This study analyzed the peer review systems, criteria, and editorial committee structures of data journals, aiming to determine the current state of data peer review and to offer suggestions.
Sunkyung Seo, Jihyun Kim
doaj +1 more source
Peer Prediction for Peer Review: Designing a Marketplace for Ideas [PDF]
arXiv, 2023 The paper describes a potential platform to facilitate academic peer review with emphasis on early-stage research. This platform aims to make peer review more accurate and timely by rewarding reviewers on the basis of peer prediction algorithms. The algorithm uses a variation of Peer Truth Serum for Crowdsourcing (Radanovic et al., 2016) with human ...
arxiv
California Agriculture, 2004 We describe three creative collaborations between the California Sea Grant Extension Program (SGEP), the California Department of Fish and Game, the fishing industry and university researchers to improve marine fisheries management in ...
Christopher Dewees +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Improving Peer Assessment with Graph Convolutional Networks [PDF]
arXiv, 2021 Peer assessment systems are emerging in many social and multi-agent settings, such as peer grading in large (online) classes, peer review in conferences, peer art evaluation, etc. However, peer assessments might not be as accurate as expert evaluations, thus rendering these systems unreliable. The reliability of peer assessment systems is influenced by
arxiv
Structured peer review: implementation and checklist development [PDF]
European Science EditingTo address the low overlap between reviewer comments and the publication recommendations they make, as well as to suggest guidance on what kind of peer review report would benefit journals and editors the most, we introduced structured peer review to ...
Bahar Mehmani, Mario Malički
doaj +3 more sources
Internet Archaeology, 2015 Peer comment on Blogging the Field School: Teaching Digital Public Archaeology by Terry P. Brock and Lynne Goldstein.
Whitney Battle-Baptiste
doaj +7 more sources