Results 31 to 40 of about 11,761,789 (305)

Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science

Scientometrics, 2020
Open peer review (OPR), where review reports and reviewers’ identities are published alongside the articles, represents one of the last aspects of the open science movement to be widely embraced, although its adoption has been growing since the turn of ...
Dietmar Wolfram, Peiling Wang, A. Hembree, Hyoungjoo Park   +3 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

A systematic review of peer support interventions for student mental health and well-being in higher education

BJPsych Open, 2023
Background Higher education institutions (HEIs) are seeking effective ways to address the rising demand for student mental health services. Peer support is widely considered a viable option to increase service capacity; however, there are no agreed ...
Julia Pointon-Haas, Luqmaan Waqar, R. Upsher, Juliet Foster, N. Byrom, Jennifer Oates   +5 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Clinical Efficacy and Therapeutic Mechanisms of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Neuroprotection and Neurogenesis in Stroke Treatment

Digital Chinese Medicine, 2018
: Stroke is the leading cause of human disability with limited effective drugs availability. The disruption of multiple signaling pathways in stroke makes developing new drugs be difficult.
Jian-Gang SHEN
doaj   +1 more source

The AI Review Lottery: Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates [PDF]

Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact.
Journals and conferences worry that peer reviews assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), in particular, large language models (LLMs), may negatively influence the validity and fairness of the peer-review system, a cornerstone of modern science. In this
Giuseppe Russo, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, Tim R. Davidson, Veniamin Veselovsky, Robert West   +4 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Arbitrariness in the peer review process

Scientometrics, 2020
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the causes and effects of arbitrariness in the peer review process. This paper focuses on two main reasons for the arbitrariness in peer review.
Elise S. Brezis, Aliaksandr Birukou
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Conserving California fish … Extension approaches applied to contentious marine-fisheries management issues

California Agriculture, 2004
We describe three creative collaborations between the California Sea Grant Extension Program (SGEP), the California Department of Fish and Game, the fishing industry and university researchers to improve marine fisheries management in ...
Christopher Dewees, Kristen Sortais, William S. Leet   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Peering into peer-review at GigaScience [PDF]

Gigascience, 2013
Abstract Fostering and promoting more open and transparent science is one of the goals of GigaScience. One of the ways we have been doing this is by throwing light on the peer-review process and carrying out open peer-review as standard.
openaire   +3 more sources

The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
What is wrong with the peer review system? Is peer review sustainable? Useful? What other models exist? These are central yet contentious questions in today’s academic discourse.
B. Aczél, A. Barwich, Amanda B. Diekman, Ayelet Fishbach, Robert L. Goldstone, Pablo Gómez, Odd Erik Gundersen, Paul T. von Hippel, Alexander O Holcombe, Stephan Lewandowsky, N. Nozari, F. Pestilli, J. Ioannidis   +12 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review

Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2023
Background There is a power imbalance between authors and reviewers in single-blind peer review. We explored how switching from single-blind to double-blind peer review affected 1) the willingness of experts to review, 2) their publication ...
Piitu Parmanne, Joonas Laajava, Noora Järvinen, Terttu Harju, Mauri Marttunen, Pertti Saloheimo   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Evaluating Bibliometrics Reviews: A Practical Guide for Peer Review and Critical Reading

Evaluation review
Along with discussing bibliometric analyses’ limitations and potential biases, this paper addresses the growing need for comprehensive guidelines in evaluating bibliometric research by providing systematic frameworks for both peer reviewers and readers ...
Anh-Duc Hoang
semanticscholar   +1 more source