Results 251 to 260 of about 11,761,789 (305)

An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
Peer assessment has proven to have positive learning outcomes. Importantly, peer assessment is a social process and some claim that the use of anonymity might have advantages. However, the findings have not always been in the same direction.
Maryam Alqassab, Ernesto Panadero
exaly   +2 more sources

Peering into Peer-Review

The Journal of Pediatrics, 2011
From the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH P eer-review is defined as the expert assessment of submitted materials. Because ‘‘the goal of this process is to ensure that the valid article is accepted, the messy article improved, and the invalid article rejected,’’ quality reviews are essential to the peer-review process and ...
Monica L, Helton, William F, Balistreri
openaire   +2 more sources

AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents

Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Peer review is fundamental to the integrity and advancement of scientific publication. Traditional methods of peer review analyses often rely on exploration and statistics of existing peer review data, which do not adequately address the multivariate ...
Yiqiao Jin   +6 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Peer reviews. A peer reviewer’s view

Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2020
This author has published on various medical topics and is obviously on several lists as a potential reviewer for papers on subjects of which he has only slight detailed knowledge. There appears to be no definition of, or qualifications for, a peer reviewer other than that he or she is, rightly or wrongly, perceived to be an expert in a particular ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Peer Review Process

Journal of Cultural Management and Cultural Policy / Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement und Kulturpolitik, 2020
All manuscripts submitted to Acta Medica Academica undergo a “doubleblind” peer review process, i.e. the reviewers do not know who the authors of the manuscript are and the authors do not have access to the information of who the peer-reviewers are. They
Martyn Shuttleworth
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Peer Review

Environmental Science & Technology, 1995
Peer review is a major component of a professional practice and shared governance model in which professional staff nurses are given responsibility for practice and patient outcomes. Careful planning is necessary for the development of a peer-review program. Components include definition of roles, responsibilities, and performance standards, as well as
A J, Micheli, S, Modest
openaire   +4 more sources

Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews

International Conference on Machine Learning
We present an approach for estimating the fraction of text in a large corpus which is likely to be substantially modified or produced by a large language model (LLM).
Weixin Liang   +11 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy