Results 291 to 300 of about 3,286,432 (344)
The future of peer review: an editorial. [PDF]
BJGP OpenGrice A, Dambha-Miller H.
europepmc +1 more source
Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study. [PDF]
BMJ OpenSims Gould J +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Lottery before peer review is associated with increased female representation and reduced estimated economic cost in a German funding line. [PDF]
Nat CommunLuebber F +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Erratum regarding missing declaration of non-involvement of the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) in Peer review of Editor-Co-Authored papers. [PDF]
Dialogues Healtheuropepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Environmental Science & Technology, 1995
Peer review is a major component of a professional practice and shared governance model in which professional staff nurses are given responsibility for practice and patient outcomes. Careful planning is necessary for the development of a peer-review program. Components include definition of roles, responsibilities, and performance standards, as well as
A J, Micheli, S, Modest
+9 more sources
Peer review is a major component of a professional practice and shared governance model in which professional staff nurses are given responsibility for practice and patient outcomes. Careful planning is necessary for the development of a peer-review program. Components include definition of roles, responsibilities, and performance standards, as well as
A J, Micheli, S, Modest
+9 more sources
The American Journal of Surgery, 2001
Peer review is essential for ensuring quality medical care. In the 1980s a physician-plaintiff prevailed in lawsuit filed against peer reviewers who excluded the physician from a hospital's medical staff. The peer reviewers had acted to preserve their own economic interests.
E H, Livingston, J D, Harwell
openaire +2 more sources
Peer review is essential for ensuring quality medical care. In the 1980s a physician-plaintiff prevailed in lawsuit filed against peer reviewers who excluded the physician from a hospital's medical staff. The peer reviewers had acted to preserve their own economic interests.
E H, Livingston, J D, Harwell
openaire +2 more sources