Results 31 to 40 of about 12,217,852 (246)

Quantifying professionalism in peer review

Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2020
The process of peer-review in academia has attracted criticism surrounding issues of bias, fairness, and professionalism; however, frequency of occurrence of such comments is unknown.
T. Gerwing, Alyssa M. Allen Gerwing, Stephanie Avery‐Gomm, Chi-Yeung Choi, J. Clements, J. Rash   +5 more
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Peer review: a process undergoing a required transformation

JLIS.it, 2022
The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of which are discussed by the authors of the articles of this issue. Is peer review really peer?
Mauro Guerrini, Andrea Capaccioni, Rossana Morriello, Editorial Board   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

The value of peer review.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2020
Benedict Rogers Editor-in-Chief of the Annals The peer review process is not new but was first described to regulate the medical profession in Ethics of the Physician (Adad al-Tabib), written by the Syrian physician Ishaq bin Ali Al-Rahawi (854-931 AD ...
Benedict Rogers
semanticscholar   +1 more source

A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer education and peer support in prisons. [PDF]

, 2015
BACKGROUND: Prisoners experience significantly worse health than the general population. This review examines the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of peer interventions in prison settings.
A Bryan, A Liebling, A Rogers, A Stant, Anne-Marie Bagnall, B Davies, B Hall, C Ashton, C Rennie, C Seale, C Sirdifield, C Sirdifield, C Walrath, C-L Dennis, CE Munoz-Plaza, Centre for Reviews Dissemination. Systematic Reviews, Claire Hulme, D Jolliffe, D Stewart, D Zucker, Department of Health, Department of Health, DP Scott, E Player, EH Goldstein, F Harris, F Syed, FW Maull, G Betts-Symond, G Chen, G Hunter, G Hunter, G Junker, Gary Raine, GJ Devilly, I Boyce, J Hoover, J Jacobson, J Levenson, J Richman, J Senior, J South, J South, J Thomas, J Thomas, JA Cichowlas, James Woodall, Jane South, K Blanchette, K Collica, K Collica, K Edgar, K Emmons, K Milburn, KA Dolan, Karen Vinall-Collier, Karina Kinsella, KC Eamon, KN Wright, KN Wright, L Finnegan, L Patel, L Snow, L Snow, Linda Harris, Ministry of Justice, MRK Boothby, MS Daigle, MW Ross, N Schlapman, N Wright, Nat MJ Wright, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NHS England, NOM Service, O Grinstead, OA Grinstead, Prison Reform Trust, R Boisvert, R Dhaliwal, R Huggins, R MacGowan, R Rees, R Walmsley, R Walmsley, R Watson, Rachael Dixey, RG Vaz, S Brooker, S Fazel, S Ginn, S Ginn, S MacAskill, S O’Hagan, S Ramsey, S Sifunda, S Sifunda, S Taylor, S Zhang, SA Lewin, Social Exclusion Unit, SS Martin, T Miller, VE Bowman, W Schinkel, W Stewart   +105 more
core   +1 more source

Innovative Strategies for Peer Review

Journal of Korean medical science, 2020
Peer review is a crucial part of research and publishing. However, it remains imperfect and suffers from bias, lack of transparency, and professional jealousy.
E. Barroga
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Review the ‘peer review’ [PDF]

Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 2017
Peer review has been the main form of appraisal of scientific knowledge for over a century. In essence, this process involves the evaluation of a scientific finding by independent experts prior to its dissemination to the scientific community, in an attempt to ensure that both the research and conclusions meet the necessary standards regarding quality,
Christophe Blockeel, Christophe Blockeel, Juan A. Garcia-Velasco, Panagiotis Drakopoulos, Nikolaos P. Polyzos, Herman Tournaye   +5 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Peer Prediction for Peer Review: Designing a Marketplace for Ideas [PDF]

arXiv, 2023
The paper describes a potential platform to facilitate academic peer review with emphasis on early-stage research. This platform aims to make peer review more accurate and timely by rewarding reviewers on the basis of peer prediction algorithms. The algorithm uses a variation of Peer Truth Serum for Crowdsourcing (Radanovic et al., 2016) with human ...
arxiv  

Peer review and citation data in predicting university rankings, a large-scale analysis [PDF]

, 2018
Most Performance-based Research Funding Systems (PRFS) draw on peer review and bibliometric indicators, two different method- ologies which are sometimes combined.
A Baccini, AG Smith, CJ Lee, D Hicks, D Sayer, DL Anderson, GB Emerson, J Mingers, M Hojat, O Mryglod, R Smith, SE Hug   +11 more
core   +2 more sources

Data journals: types of peer review, review criteria, and editorial committee members’ positions [PDF]

Science Editing, 2020
Purpose This study analyzed the peer review systems, criteria, and editorial committee structures of data journals, aiming to determine the current state of data peer review and to offer suggestions.
Sunkyung Seo, Jihyun Kim
doaj   +1 more source

Student experiences of peer review marking of team projects [PDF]

, 2007
Peer review of students is a partial response to critics of group work who cite drawbacks of "free riders" and de-motivation. It is often used to motivate and focus students on their own development within a group work setting.
Coates, D, Palermo, O, Pond, K
core   +2 more sources