Results 191 to 200 of about 187,044 (278)
Recognition, Workload and Sustainability: Perspectives of Australian Journal Editors
ABSTRACT This study explores the experiences and perspectives of journal editors in Australia, focusing on their pathways into editorship, required skills, challenges and issues relating to recognition, workload and succession planning. Based on in‐depth qualitative interviews with 27 editors across a range of disciplines and publishing models, we ...
Edward J. Luca +2 more
wiley +1 more source
ABSTRACT Peer review has long been regarded as a cornerstone of scholarly communication, ensuring high quality and credibility of published research. Although academic journals trace their origins back three centuries, the procedures for evaluating submissions, particularly peer review, have undergone continuous evolution.
Dmitry Kochetkov
wiley +1 more source
Retraction: Undifferentiated pleiomorphic sarcoma simultaneously occuring with thymoma. [PDF]
Editorial Office.
europepmc +1 more source
AI And the Editors' Ghost: Who Is the Writer Now?
ABSTRACT This an exploration of the use of AI in research and writing. It builds upon the ‘Harbingers’ project, an international and longitudinal study of early career researchers (ECRs) and scholarly communication. In the fourth phase of the project, we returned to the theme of AI, in particular AI as ‘ghostwriter’.
David Clark +9 more
wiley +1 more source
Trends in Artificial Intelligence Usage in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applications. [PDF]
Hawthorne BC +9 more
europepmc +1 more source
Scholarly Communications in 2025: An Aerial Evaluation of a System Challenged by AI and Much More
ABSTRACT Using data obtained from the 2025 round of the Harbingers project on early career researchers (ECRs), artificial intelligence (AI) and scholarly communications, we provide an overarching (aerial) analysis of the AI‐impacted scholarly communications system.
David Nicholas +8 more
wiley +1 more source

