Results 61 to 70 of about 686,562 (96)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2010
AbstractClient preferences are recognized as a key component to evidence‐based practice; however, research has yet to confirm the actual influence preferences have on treatment outcome. In this meta‐analysis, we summarize results from 35 studies that have examined the preference effect with adult clients.
Joshua K, Swift +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractClient preferences are recognized as a key component to evidence‐based practice; however, research has yet to confirm the actual influence preferences have on treatment outcome. In this meta‐analysis, we summarize results from 35 studies that have examined the preference effect with adult clients.
Joshua K, Swift +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Experimental Economics, 2020
AbstractIs the assumption that people automatically know their own preferences innocuous? We present an experiment studying the limits of preference discovery. If tastes must be learned through experience, preferences for some goods may never be learned because it is costly to try new things, and thus non-learned preferences may cause welfare loss.
Jason Delaney +2 more
openaire +1 more source
AbstractIs the assumption that people automatically know their own preferences innocuous? We present an experiment studying the limits of preference discovery. If tastes must be learned through experience, preferences for some goods may never be learned because it is costly to try new things, and thus non-learned preferences may cause welfare loss.
Jason Delaney +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Metrizable preferences over preferences
Social Choice and Welfare, 2020zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Laffond, Gilbert +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Aesthetic preference and lateral preferences
Neuropsychologia, 1986Subjects expressed preference for original or mirror-reversed versions of paintings. Hand preference predicted a significant proportion of the choice variance, but eye, foot and ear preference did not, nor did family sinistrality.
openaire +2 more sources
2012
This article explores our current understanding of why we like and choose to listen to the music that we do. It begins by defining terms and considering methods, moving on to discuss the biological influences of arousal and other personality traits on music preference, questions of style discrimination, and finally the cultural influences of experience
Alinka Greasley, Alexandra Lamont
openaire +1 more source
This article explores our current understanding of why we like and choose to listen to the music that we do. It begins by defining terms and considering methods, moving on to discuss the biological influences of arousal and other personality traits on music preference, questions of style discrimination, and finally the cultural influences of experience
Alinka Greasley, Alexandra Lamont
openaire +1 more source
2012
Personal experience, learned eating behaviors, hormones, neurotransmitters, and genetic variations affect food consumption. The decision of what to eat is modulated by taste, olfaction, and oral textural perception. Taste, in particular, has an important input into food preference, permitting individuals to differentiate nutritive and harmful ...
María Mercedes, Galindo +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Personal experience, learned eating behaviors, hormones, neurotransmitters, and genetic variations affect food consumption. The decision of what to eat is modulated by taste, olfaction, and oral textural perception. Taste, in particular, has an important input into food preference, permitting individuals to differentiate nutritive and harmful ...
María Mercedes, Galindo +4 more
openaire +2 more sources
Social preferences aren’t preferences
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2010Abstract Experimental economists robustly observe that people in the laboratory regularly make choices that result in lower payoffs for themselves. When faced with this paradox of preferences, economists posit that there must be two meanings of preferences: preferences for the self and preferences for the social. In this paper I argue that this is an
openaire +2 more sources
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
In 5 experiments we show that choices between bundles of consumption goods exhibit a preference for ‘order’ that cannot be explained on the basis of utility for consumption itself. The first 3 experiments show that this order-preference is strong and produces robust violations of normative properties of decision making; most strikingly dominance.
Evers, E.R.K. +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
In 5 experiments we show that choices between bundles of consumption goods exhibit a preference for ‘order’ that cannot be explained on the basis of utility for consumption itself. The first 3 experiments show that this order-preference is strong and produces robust violations of normative properties of decision making; most strikingly dominance.
Evers, E.R.K. +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of Economic Theory, 2009
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Lehrer, Ehud, Teper, Roee
openaire +2 more sources
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Lehrer, Ehud, Teper, Roee
openaire +2 more sources
2011
This chapter examines how social preferences contribute to human cooperation. It considers experimental and other evidence showing that even in one-shot interactions many individuals, most in some settings, willingly cooperate with strangers even at a cost to themselves.
Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis
openaire +1 more source
This chapter examines how social preferences contribute to human cooperation. It considers experimental and other evidence showing that even in one-shot interactions many individuals, most in some settings, willingly cooperate with strangers even at a cost to themselves.
Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis
openaire +1 more source