Legitimacy and effectiveness concerns in China's private antitrust enforcement regime : a comparative analysis with the EU and US regimes [PDF]
, 2023 The year 2007 heralded a major advance in China’s entry to the global economy’s rules-based marketplace. Its Anti-MonopolyLaw 2007 (AML 2007) taking inspiration from European Union (EU) antitrust concepts contained internationally familiar key antitrust ...
Cahill, Dermot, Wang, Jing
core
The Type of Liability in Private Enforcement in Selected CEE Countries Relating to the Implementation of the Damages Directive [PDF]
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 2017 The article is devoted to the type of liability in selected CEE countries, namely those covered by the national reports drafted for the 2nd International Conference on Harmonization of Private Antitrust Enforcement: Central and Eastern European ...
Dominik Wolski
doaj +1 more source
Public Policy as a Ground for Refusal to Enforce EU Antitrust Damages Awards
Oslo Law Review, 2018 The Brussels I Regulation is crucial for the effectiveness of EU competition law in the field of private enforcement because it provides a legal framework for the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, which includes ...
Alla Pozdnakova
doaj +1 more source
Arbitration Agreements and Actions for Antitrust Damages Afterthe CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment [PDF]
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 2017 On May 21st 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union in CDC Hydrogen Peroxide decided whether the application of jurisdiction clauses in actions for damages impedes the effective enforcement of EU competition law. The CJ stayed silent,
Katarzyna Sadrak
doaj +1 more source
Package on Actions for Damages Based on Breaches of EU Competition Rules: Can One Size Fit All? [PDF]
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 2014 On 17 April 2014, the Proposal for a Directive on antitrust damages actions was accepted by the European Parliament and sent to the EU Council of Ministers for final approval.
Sofia Oliveira Pais, Anna Piszcz
doaj
Disclosure of Evidence in Central and Eastern European Countries in Light of the Implementation of the Damages Directive [PDF]
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 2017 The article looks primarily at the material comprised in the volume edited by A. Piszcz, Implementation of the EU Damages Directive in Central and Eastern European Countries published in 2017and based on that compares aspects of the disclosure of ...
Inese Druviete +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Essays on Private Antitrust Enforcement
, 2020 This thesis studies the economic impact of private antitrust enforcement on competition and on cartel members’ compensation payments. After Chapter 1’s short introduction to the topic, Chapter 2 investigates the effects of compulsory compensation for umbrella losses on competition.
openaire +3 more sources
Provisions of the Damages Directive on Limitation Periods and their Implementation in CEE Countries [PDF]
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 2017 The article analyses the provisions on limitation of antitrust damages actions set out in Directive 2014/104/EU on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of
Ana Vlahek, Klemen Podobnik
doaj +1 more source
Collecting Evidence Through Access to Competition Authorities’ Files – Interplay or Potential Conflicts Between Private and Public Enforcement Proceedings? [PDF]
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies, 2015 Information asymmetry between claimants seeking damages for competition law violations and the alleged infringing undertaking(s) is a key problem in the development of private antitrust enforcement because it often prevents successful actions for damages.
Anna Gulińska
doaj +1 more source
PRIVATE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT IN THE PRESENCE OF PRE‐TRIAL BARGAINING* [PDF]
The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2009 We study the effect of encouraging private actions for breaches of competition law. We develop a model of litigation and settlement with asymmetric information. We show that screening liable from non‐liable defendants requires the Court to restrict the rules governing admissible evidence.
Bourjade, Sylvain +2 more
openaire +5 more sources