Results 121 to 130 of about 22,542,366 (287)
Managing the peer review process is one of the major attractions and benefits of the current publisher-driven publishing environment. Would it be possible to maintain peer review in different systemââ¬âperhaps one where peer review happens at the ...
Valdés Ugalde, Francisco +11 more
core +1 more source
Ongoing debates surrounding Open Access to the scholarly literature are multifaceted and complicated by disparate and often polarised viewpoints from engaged stakeholders.
Jonathan P. Tennant +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Septin 9 polybasic domains couple phosphoinositide‐rich membrane binding to centrosome positioning, Golgi organization, and microtubule acetylation to control epithelial polarity. Their loss disrupts this axis, causing centrosome mispositioning, Golgi fragmentation, reduced microtubule acetylation, and polarity inversion via upregulation of the ...
Ting ting Cai +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation [PDF]
I reviewed the published empirical evidence concerning journal peer review, which consisted of 68 papers, all but three published since 1975. Peer review improves quality, but its use to screen papers has met with limited success.
JS Armstrong
core
Data publication consensus and controversies [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/3hi]
The movement to bring datasets into the scholarly record as first class research products (validated, preserved, cited, and credited) has been inching forward for some time, but now the pace is quickening.
John Kratz, Carly Strasser
doaj +1 more source
Degradation mechanism of the von Willebrand factor A2 domain by nattokinase
Nattokinase, a natto‐derived protease, exhibits potent antithrombotic effects. This study demonstrates that nattokinase directly cleaves the von Willebrand factor (vWF) A2 domain in vitro. Unlike the native regulator ADAMTS13, nattokinase degrades folded vWF independently of shear stress.
Ryuichi Hyakumoto +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Peer Review : Publishing The Present
"Complementing the archival project Publishing the Present: An Archive of Mutual Care and Action (2020-2021), the second volume of PEER REVIEW explores community-oriented publishing practices and their responses to our ongoing moment of multifaceted ...
Monsalve, Adriana +7 more
core +1 more source
Modelling stem cell differentiation related processes—A practical overview for biologists
Stem cell differentiation is complex and difficult to control experimentally. This review introduces suitable computational modelling approaches that can support stem cell research, from mechanistic ODE and abstract models to multiscale and deep learning methods.
Ricco Zeegelaar +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Decoupling the scholarly journal
Although many observers have advocated the reform of the scholarly publishing system, improvementsto functions like peer review have been adopted sluggishly.
Jason ePriem, Bradley H. Hemminger
doaj +1 more source
Design and analysis strategies for robust microbiome ageing research
The gut microbiome changes with age and associates with age‐related morbidity and mortality, establishing it as a potential biomarker and intervention target for ageing. Realising this potential requires methodological rigour, yet distinguishing biological signals from methodological artefacts remains challenging across cohorts. This review provides an
Mark Olenik +5 more
wiley +1 more source

