Results 31 to 40 of about 362,520 (285)
Rapid reviews: definitions and uses
Medwave, 2021 This article is the first in a collaborative methodological series of narrative reviews on biostatistics and clinical epidemiology. This review aims to present rapid reviews, compare them with systematic reviews, and mention how they can be used. Rapid reviews use a methodology like systematic reviews, but through shortcuts applied, they can attain ...
Luis Tapia-Benavente +5 more
openaire +4 more sources
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2020 Background Systematic reviews often require substantial resources, partially due to the large number of records identified during searching. Although artificial intelligence may not be ready to fully replace human reviewers, it may accelerate and reduce ...
C. Hamel +5 more
doaj +1 more source
Rapid Reviews in Software Engineering [PDF]
, 2020 Integrating research evidence into practice is one of the main goals of Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE). Secondary studies, one of the main EBSE products, are intended to summarize the best research evidence and make them easily consumable by practitioners.
Bruno Cartaxo +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews [PDF]
, 2015 BACKGROUND: Rapid review (RR) products are inherently appealing as they are intended to be less time-consuming and resource-intensive than traditional systematic reviews (SRs); however, there is concern about the rigor of methods and reliability of ...
Umscheid, Craig A. +8 more
core +1 more source
PCP in 2003: Rapid Reviewing and Rapid Publication [PDF]
Plant and Cell Physiology, 2003 2002 has been a very exciting year for Plant and Cell Physiology. During the last fiscal year we received 367 newly submitted articles, the largest growth ever. PCP leads the new frontier of online journals. In July 2000, PCP started as an online journal, and an online submission and review system was introduced last May.
openaire +2 more sources
Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement [PDF]
, 2022 The demand for rapid reviews has exploded in recent years. A rapid review is an approach to evidence synthesis that provides timely information to decision-makers (eg, health care planners, providers, policymakers, patients) by simplifying the evidence ...
Godfrey, Christina +23 more
core +4 more sources
Expediting evidence synthesis for healthcare decision-making: exploring attitudes and perceptions towards rapid reviews using Q methodology [PDF]
PeerJ, 2016 Background Rapid reviews expedite the knowledge synthesis process with the goal of providing timely information to healthcare decision-makers who want to use evidence-informed policy and practice approaches.
Shannon E. Kelly +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
HRB Open Research, 2021 Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence
Claire Beecher +24 more
doaj +1 more source
Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study
Systematic Reviews, 2019 Background Web applications that employ natural language processing technologies to support systematic reviewers during abstract screening have become more common.
Gerald Gartlehner +6 more
doaj +1 more source
HRB Open Research, 2021 Background: The value of rapid reviews in informing health care decisions is more evident since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While systematic reviews can be completed rapidly, rapid reviews are usually a type of evidence
Claire Beecher +24 more
doaj +1 more source