Results 141 to 150 of about 145,906 (324)
Old and new approaches to marketing. The quest of their epistemological roots [PDF]
In recent years the marketing discipline faced a considerable increase in the number of approaches. Some of the new "labels" are probably just new names advertised to sell old products.
Stocchetti, Andrea, Volpato, Giuseppe
core +1 more source
A Modest Conception of Moral Right & Wrong
ABSTRACT Taking inspiration from Hume, I advance a conception of the part of morality concerned with right and wrong, rooted in the actual moral rules established and followed within our society. Elsewhere, I have argued this approach provides a way of thinking about how we are genuinely “bound in a moral way” to keep our moral obligations that it is ...
Jorah Dannenberg
wiley +1 more source
This article studies the empiricist and rationalist worldviews presented in H. C. Andersen’s enigmatic fairy tale “The Snow Queen”. These two epistemic views are in contest not only with one another but also with the Christian doctrine that challenges ...
Katariina Kärkelä
doaj
Human infants are aroused and concerned by moral transgressions. [PDF]
Kassecker A, Verschoor SA, Schmidt MFH.
europepmc +1 more source
Contested but Resilient: Accounting for the Endurance of the European Union's Foreign Policy
JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, EarlyView.
Oriol Costa +3 more
wiley +1 more source
Contingent Grounding Physicalism
ABSTRACT It is widely held that physicalism is incompatible with the metaphysical possibility of zombies, i.e., beings physically just like us yet lacking in phenomenal consciousness. The present paper argues that this orthodoxy is mistaken. As against the received wisdom, physicalism is perfectly compatible with the possibility of zombies and zombie ...
Alex Moran
wiley +1 more source
Analysis of the Causes of the Iraq War from Rationalism Perspective
Hongyu Hu
openalex +2 more sources
The Illusion of Permissive Balancing
ABSTRACT The standard view among philosophers of normativity is that practical reasons balance permissively (i.e., when reasons are tied between incompatible actions, either action is rational), while epistemic reasons balance prohibitively (i.e., when reasons are tied between incompatible doxastic attitudes, neither attitude may be rationally formed).
Jordan Scott
wiley +1 more source

