Results 161 to 170 of about 481,579 (190)

Differences between research ethics committees

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2007
Objectives:To examine differences in the ethical judgments made by Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).Methods:We did a review of the literature and included any study that attempted to compare the ethical judgments made by different RECs or IRBs when reviewing one or more protocol.Results:There were twenty-six ...
Sarah J L, Edwards, Tracey, Stone, Teresa, Swift   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Research Ethics Committees

2012
Human research ethics comprise principles and processes. Common principles include the requirements that research involving humans has merit and is beneficial, that researchers have integrity, that the benefits and burdens of research participation are justly shared, that risks to participants are minimized and are justified by potential benefits, and ...
openaire   +2 more sources

Business Research Ethics Committees

Finance and Business Economies Review, 2019
Developed countries use scientific research to solve their problems, promote their societies and achievesustainable development. To organize the research activities and to ensure its integrity and credibility,research ethics committees have been established in the academic institutions of these countries.
openaire   +1 more source

Research Ethics Committees in Hungary

2017
The general rules for conducting biomedical research were laid down in the Health Care Act of 1997, while conditions for research on human beings were specified in a Ministry Decree issued in 2002. The main task of local research ethics committees is to check whether the personal and technological conditions at the health institution are adequate for ...
openaire   +1 more source

RESEARCH AND ETHICS COMMITTEES

The Lancet, 1983
openaire   +2 more sources

Ethics and Cancer

Ca-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1987
exaly   +4 more sources

Research Ethics Committee

2013
Kristine M. Molina, Kristine M. Molina, Heather Honoré Goltz, Marc A. Kowalkouski, Stacey L. Hart, David Latini, J. Rick Turner, J. Rick Turner, Leah Rosenberg, Sarah Piper, Leah Rosenberg, Sarah Piper, Timothy Wolf, Paul A. Estabrooks, Samantha M. Harden, Kacie C. Allen, Laura Rodriguez-Murillo, Rany M. Salem, J. Rick Turner, Jennifer Wessel, J. Rick Turner, Bengt H. Sjölund, M. Kathleen B. Lustyk, J. Rick Turner, Hiroe Kikuchi, Yori Gidron, Stephen Gallagher, Warren Tierney, Jennifer Wortmann, Login S. George, Crystal L. Park, Chad Barrett, Stephen Gallagher, Warren Tierney, Salvatore Insana, George J. Trachte, Ulrike Ehlert, Simona Fischbacher, J. Rick Turner, Marianne Shaughnessy, Bonnie Spring, Alex Pictor, Andrew DeMott, Molly Ferguson, Arlen C. Moller, Judith Carroll, Chris Dunkel Schetter, Susanne Fischer, Roland Thomeé, Randall Steven Jorgensen, Jane Monaco, Toshihide Hashimoto, Alexandra Martin, Bernt Lindahl, Catherine Darker, Tereza Killianova, Jana Strahler, Stephanie Ann Hooker, Yori Gidron   +58 more
openaire   +1 more source

Law, ethics and research ethics committees.

Medicine and law, 2002
This paper examines the view of the operational management of the UK Research Ethics Committee (REC) system that RECs may not reject applications on purely legal grounds. Two arguments are offered for this view: the first rests on the contention that being lawful and being ethical are not the same thing; the second is that RECs lack expertise and ...
openaire   +1 more source

Biomedical ethics 2.0: redefining the meaning of disease, patient and treatment

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2020
Frederick Grinnell
exaly  

Toward a Better Understanding of Behavioral Ethics in the Workplace

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2020
David De Cremer, Celia Moore
exaly