Results 251 to 260 of about 10,827,159 (305)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Nursing Administration Quarterly, 1996
Evaluation is often described as different from research. In this article, common myths about evaluation are discussed as well as reasons these myths no longer fit with current understanding of evaluation research. Issues associated with the conduct of evaluation studies are described, with recommendations made for maximizing the rigor of designs ...
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluation is often described as different from research. In this article, common myths about evaluation are discussed as well as reasons these myths no longer fit with current understanding of evaluation research. Issues associated with the conduct of evaluation studies are described, with recommendations made for maximizing the rigor of designs ...
openaire +2 more sources
The Evaluator/Researcher as Person vs. The Person as Evaluator/Researcher
Educational Researcher, 1988This paper outlines two views of what it means to be a person and then discusses the relationship of these views to the issues of relativism and research methods. The contention is that relativism is an inevitable consequence of our interpretive or significance-making mode of being in the world.
openaire +1 more source
Research on research evaluation
Social Epistemology, 1996(1996). Research on research evaluation. Social Epistemology: Vol. 10, Economic Metaphors in Science Studies, pp. 209-250.
openaire +1 more source
Interrelated Issues in Evaluation and Evaluation Research
Nursing Research, 1980In an attempt to apply the scientific method to quality assessment, a methodological chart is presented which clarifies the meaning and use of measurement and its relationship to decisions about appropriateness of quality assessment procedures. Six quality assessment research issues are proposed and discussed. It is suggested that quality assessors and
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating the Risks of Clinical Research
JAMA, 2010The ethical appropriateness of clinical research depends on protecting participants from excessive risks. Yet no systematic framework has been developed to assess research risks, and as a result, investigators, funders, and review boards rely only on their intuitive judgments. Because intuitive judgments of risk are subject to well-documented cognitive
Rid, Annette +2 more
openaire +4 more sources
Evaluation of qualitative research
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2003Summary• It is necessary to subject published research to critical scrutiny, in order to evaluate the robustness of the findings.• The criteria used in evaluation require to be appropriate for the research paradigm, i.e. quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative conceptualizations of reliability and validity are unsuitable for evaluation of qualitative
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluation of industrial research
Scientometrics, 1996La rentabilite des investissements en biotechnologie s'effectue a long terme, le temps etant tres long entre la decouverte et la mise sur le marche. L'A.
openaire +1 more source
Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, 1980
Once formal training ends, the physician must strive to stay abreast of current changes and innovations in medical technology. Of the sources available for keeping current, journals may create difficulties for physicians not trained in research methodology.
openaire +2 more sources
Once formal training ends, the physician must strive to stay abreast of current changes and innovations in medical technology. Of the sources available for keeping current, journals may create difficulties for physicians not trained in research methodology.
openaire +2 more sources
2017
This chapter identifies similarities and differences between research and evaluation, and, in doing so, sets out connections between evaluation, research, politics and policy making. It indicates that whilst both evaluation and research have much in common, for example, in methodologies and methods, there are several fundamental differences between ...
Louis Cohen +2 more
openaire +1 more source
This chapter identifies similarities and differences between research and evaluation, and, in doing so, sets out connections between evaluation, research, politics and policy making. It indicates that whilst both evaluation and research have much in common, for example, in methodologies and methods, there are several fundamental differences between ...
Louis Cohen +2 more
openaire +1 more source