Results 11 to 20 of about 426,855 (260)
Reviews, reviews, reviews [PDF]
Deputy Editor‐in‐Chief, Dr Patrick Chien, discusses his top articles from this issue in an audio podcast available at: https://soundcloud.com/bjog/january-editors-choice ...
openaire +2 more sources
Pitfalls in statistical analysis – A Reviewers' perspective
Statistics are a quintessential part of scientific manuscripts. Few journals are free of statistics-related errors. Errors can occur in data reporting and presentation, choosing the appropriate or the most powerful statistical test, misinterpretation or ...
Sakir Ahmed, Aadhaar Dhooria
doaj +1 more source
Literature Reviews in HCI: A Review of Reviews
This paper analyses Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) literature reviews to provide a clear conceptual basis for authors, reviewers, and readers. HCI is multidisciplinary and various types of literature reviews exist, from systematic to critical reviews in the style of essays.
Evropi Stefanidi +8 more
openaire +3 more sources
Review the ‘peer review’ [PDF]
Peer review has been the main form of appraisal of scientific knowledge for over a century. In essence, this process involves the evaluation of a scientific finding by independent experts prior to its dissemination to the scientific community, in an attempt to ensure that both the research and conclusions meet the necessary standards regarding quality,
Blockeel, Christophe +4 more
openaire +3 more sources
On the Censorship of Karachay National Book During the Period of Cultural Development
In this article on the basis of previously unknown documents, learned by the author from the State archive of the Stavropol region, the State archive of the contemporary history of the Stavropol region, the State archive of Karachay-Cherkess Republic ...
Kurmanseitova Aminat Kh.
doaj +1 more source
Who is the Editor-in-Chief of a scientific journal: supreme judge or mailman? [PDF]
The editor-in-chief plays a vital role in ensuring a journal’s scientific integrity and quality. Their primary responsibilities include managing the peer-review process, selecting qualified reviewers, and making final decisions on manuscript acceptance ...
Eugenio Picano
doaj +1 more source
Educational researchers developed an online repository of effective practices contributing to or enhancing the teaching culture at multiple higher education institutions as part of a larger project exploring institutional teaching culture. The repository
Donna Ellis +5 more
doaj +2 more sources
Who is a reviewer? The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly phenotypes [PDF]
By offering their expertise, reviewers help authors improve their work and also support editors in selecting high-quality studies, thereby reinforcing the integrity of scientific literature.
Eugenio Picano
doaj +1 more source
Wearing the consultant’s hat: Training faculty to perform quality peer reviews
The claim has been made for decades that college teaching, like research, should be peer reviewed if we are to see it as a serious scholarly activity; yet peer review as a method of evaluating teaching is not widespread.
Eric Metzler, Lisa Kurz
doaj +2 more sources
Anna Kaatz was working on a Ph.D. in comparative literature, studying old medical texts and public health codes, when her major professor was jailed and fired for sending sexually explicit material to a detective posing as a minor.
openaire +2 more sources

