Scientific evaluation of the scholarly publications. [PDF]
Worthiness of any scientific journal is measured by the quality of the articles published in it. The Impact factor (IF) is one popular tool which analyses the quality of journal in terms of citations received by its published articles. It is usually assumed that journals with high IF carry meaningful, prominent, and quality research.
Saxena A +3 more
europepmc +5 more sources
[External scientific evaluation of the first teledermatology app without direct patient contact in Germany (Online Dermatologist-AppDoc)]. [PDF]
BACKGROUND Teledermatology addresses the problems associated with the lack of specialists and the often long waiting time for an appointment with a dermatologist.
Sondermann W +8 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Recommended approaches to the scientific evaluation of ecotoxicological hazards and risks of endocrine-active substances. [PDF]
A SETAC Pellston Workshop® “Environmental Hazard and Risk Assessment Approaches for Endocrine‐Active Substances (EHRA)” was held in February 2016 in Pensacola, Florida, USA.
Matthiessen P +47 more
europepmc +2 more sources
Integrated Care for People with Dementia-Results of a Social-Scientific Evaluation of an Established Dementia Care Model. [PDF]
Currently, approximately 46.8 million people worldwide and 1.47 million German people are affected by dementia. The rising numbers of cases of people with dementia, the need for complex care and the insufficient care available call for innovative and ...
Richter S.
europepmc +2 more sources
The need for registries in the early scientific evaluation of surgical innovations. [PDF]
As a field, surgery has generated some of the leading innovators in history (1). Advances in immunology and microbiology knowledge and exciting technological developments, e.g., 3D imaging, robotic surgery, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,
Köckerling F.
europepmc +2 more sources
Scientific Collaboratories: Evaluating their Potential [PDF]
L'auteur presente une evaluation ayant pour but de repondre aux questions suivantes: la recherche scientifique repartie (laboratoire virtuel) peut-elle produire des resultats de qualite elevee? les avantages des labos virtuels compenssent-ils les inconvenients, selon les scientifiques eux-memes?
Sonnenwald, Diane H. +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific Research [PDF]
Recently, there has been growing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) for scientific research. Numerous benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate the ability of LLMs for scientific research.
Liangtai Sun +7 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
This work presents an analysis of data recorded by a bicycle computer paired with typical measurement sensors in order to determine whether the data can be useful for a scientific evaluation of the cyclist–electric bicycle anthropotechnical system. There
T. Matyja, A. Kubik, Z. Stanik
semanticscholar +1 more source
Scientific Credibility of Machine Translation Research: A Meta-Evaluation of 769 Papers [PDF]
This paper presents the first large-scale meta-evaluation of machine translation (MT). We annotated MT evaluations conducted in 769 research papers published from 2010 to 2020.
Benjamin Marie +2 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
β-lactam antibiotics, including cephalosporins, are the drugs of choice for empirical antibiotic therapy (ABT) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
T. V. Alexandrova +9 more
doaj +1 more source

