Results 281 to 290 of about 855,880 (342)
Challenges in assessing scientific reasoning and argumentation in psychology education
Marleen Evers +2 more
openalex +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Scientific reasoning and counterfactual reasoning in development
2021In this chapter, we bridge research on scientific and counterfactual reasoning. We review findings that children struggle with many aspects of scientific experimentation in the absence of formal instruction, but show sophistication in the ability to reason about counterfactual possibilities.
Nyhout, Angela, Ganea, Patricia A.
openaire +2 more sources
2016
In this chapter, the Scientific Reasoning subtest is described. The reason for each of the task-types chosen for this subtest is discussed. The skills tapped by this subtest include: covariation detection; falsification tendencies in the four-card selection task; understanding the logic of converging evidence; the ability to avoid drawing causal ...
Keith E. Stanovich +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
In this chapter, the Scientific Reasoning subtest is described. The reason for each of the task-types chosen for this subtest is discussed. The skills tapped by this subtest include: covariation detection; falsification tendencies in the four-card selection task; understanding the logic of converging evidence; the ability to avoid drawing causal ...
Keith E. Stanovich +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
2021
In addition to the technical and experimental skills in daily lab work and a profound knowledge of one's professional field, chemical researchers need competence in analysing and interpreting their acquired experimental data in view of the claims they made in their research hypotheses. Both making proper hypotheses and interpreting data in a scientific
openaire +1 more source
In addition to the technical and experimental skills in daily lab work and a profound knowledge of one's professional field, chemical researchers need competence in analysing and interpreting their acquired experimental data in view of the claims they made in their research hypotheses. Both making proper hypotheses and interpreting data in a scientific
openaire +1 more source
Scientific reasoning and due process
Science and Engineering Ethics, 1996Recent public hearings on misconduct charges belie the conjecture that due process will perforce defeat informed scientific reasoning. One notable case that reviewed an obtuse description of experimental methods displays some of the subtleties of differentiating carelessness from intent to deceive.
Louis M, Guenin, Bernard D, Davis
openaire +2 more sources