Results 131 to 140 of about 517 (142)

Liberal and Conservative Differential Item Functioning Detection Using Mantel-Haenszel and SIBTEST: Implications for Type I and Type II Error Rates

The Journal of Experimental Education, 2004
The aim of this work was to determine, in terms of Type I and Type II error rates, the risks of applying various statistical procedures for evaluating differential item functioning. To this end, the authors carried out a simulation study in which the Mantel-Haenszel and SIBTEST procedures were applied in conjunction.
Ángel M. Fidalgo, Doris Ferreres, José Muñiz   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

The MIMIC Model as a Method for Detecting DIF: Comparison With Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST, and the IRT Likelihood Ratio

Applied Psychological Measurement, 2005
This study compares the ability of the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) confirmatory factor analysis model to correctly identify cases of differential item functioning (DIF) with more established methods. Although the MIMIC model might have application in identifying DIF for multiple grouping variables, there has been little examination of ...
openaire   +1 more source

The effect of large ability differences on type I error and power rates using SIBTEST and TESTGRAF DIF detection procedures

2001
A simulation study was conducted to examine the effect of large ability differences using two differential item functioning (DIF) detection procedures, SIBTEST and TESTGRAF. DIF items are hard to identify when group ability differences are large (Gotzmann, Vandenberghe, & Gierl, 2000; Hambleton & Rogers, 1989).
openaire   +1 more source

Effect of Unequal Sample Sizes on the Power of DIF Detection: An IRT-Based Monte Carlo Study with SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel Procedures

2014
Ph. D.
openaire   +1 more source

Small-Sample DIF Estimation Using SIBTEST, Cochran’s Z , and Log-Linear Smoothing

Applied Psychological Measurement, 2013
Hongli Li, Pui-Wa Lei
exaly  

Effects of Unequal Ability Variances on the Performance of Logistic Regression, Mantel-Haenszel, SIBTEST IRT, and IRT Likelihood Ratio for DIF Detection

Applied Psychological Measurement, 2010
Lai Kwan Pei, Jun Li
openaire   +1 more source

Establishing Effect Size Guidelines for Interpreting the Results of Differential Bundle Functioning Analyses Using SIBTEST

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
Cindy M Walker
exaly  

Controlling Type I Error Rates in Assessing DIF for Logistic Regression Method Combined With SIBTEST Regression Correction Procedure and DIF-Free-Then-DIF Strategy

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2014
Wen-Chung Wang, Ching-Lin Shih
exaly  

Improving the Crossing-SIBTEST Statistic for Detecting Non-uniform DIF

Psychometrika, 2017
exaly  

The Development of a Standardized Effect Size for the SIBTEST Procedure

Journal of Experimental Education
Brandon L Crawford, Xinya Liang
exaly