Results 31 to 40 of about 434,018 (130)

Uralic vs Indo-European contacts: borrowing vs local emergence vs chance resemblances

, 2014
The article describes the (assumed) contacts and borrowing between Indo-European and Uralic, pointing out that borrowing at the level of proto-languages is a priori impossible, and that therefore the few, real correlations among Uralic and Indo-European ...
MARCANTONIO, Angela
core   +1 more source

Indo-Uralic and Altaic

, 2010
Elsewhere I have argued that the Indo-European verbal system can be understood in terms of its Indo-Uralic origins because the reconstructed Indo-European endings can be derived from combinations of Indo-Uralic morphemes by a series of well-motivated ...
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core  

The Indo-Uralic verb

, 2010
C.C. Uhlenbeck made a distinction between two components of Proto-Indo-European, which he called A and B (1935a: 133ff.). The first component comprises pronouns, verbal roots, and derivational suffixes, and may be compared with Uralic, whereas the second
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core  

Indo-Uralic consonant gradation

, 2010
Koivulehto and Vennemann have recently (1996) revived Posti’s theory (1953) which attributed Finnic consonant gradation to Germanic influence, in particular to the influence of Verner’s law. This theory disregards the major differences between Finnic and
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core  

Uralic Languages

, 2017
All but three of the thirty-nine Uralic languages are endangered, most of them seriously so; of the family’s ten main branches, only two have members considered safe (Finnish and Estonian of the Fennic branch, plus Hungarian).
Daniel Abondolo
core   +1 more source

Comments on Uralic historical phonology [PDF]

, 2013
In this paper, the author poses three questions of historical phonology and gives explanations that are meant to be rational: 1. With respect to the Hungarian reflexes of Proto-Uralic/Proto-Finno-Ugric/Proto-Ugric word initial *p, *t, and *k, two ...
Honti, László, László Honti
core   +1 more source

Nivkh as a Uralo-Siberian language

, 2010
In his magnificent book on the language relations across Bering Strait (1998), Michael Fortescue does not consider Nivkh (Gilyak) to be a Uralo-Siberian language.
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core  

Hittite ammuk 'me'

, 2010
In the Indo-European department of Leiden University, Alwin Kloekhorst has initiated a discussion on Hittite ammuk ‘me’. The central question is: where did the geminate come from?
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core  

An outline of Proto-Indo-European

, 2010
Indo-European is a branch of Indo-Uralic which was radically transformed under the influence of a North Caucasian substratum when its speakers moved from the area north of the Caspian Sea to the area north of the Black Sea (cf. Kortlandt 2007b).
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core  

The Inverse Agreement Constraint in Uralic languages

, 2013
The paper aims to answer the question why object–verb agreement is blocked in Hungarian, Tundra Nenets, Selkup, and Nganasan if the object is a first or second person pronoun.
É. Kiss, Katalin
core