Results 21 to 30 of about 4,193,923 (352)

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The use of correlation techniques

open access: yesPerspectives in Clinical Research, 2016
Correlation is a statistical technique which shows whether and how strongly two continuous variables are related. In this article, which is the eighth part in a series on ′Common pitfalls in Statistical Analysis′, we look at the interpretation of the ...
Rakesh Aggarwal, Priya Ranganathan
doaj   +1 more source

Index of orthodontic treatment need in children from the Niš region [PDF]

open access: yesVojnosanitetski Pregled, 2015
Background/Aim. The Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) is a scoring system for malocclusion that consists of the two independent components: Denal Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC).
Janošević Predrag   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comprehensive guidelines for appropriate statistical analysis methods in research [PDF]

open access: yesKorean Journal of Anesthesiology
Background The selection of statistical analysis methods in research is a critical and nuanced task that requires a scientific and rational approach. Aligning the chosen method with the specifics of the research design and hypothesis is paramount, as it ...
Jonghae Kim   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Equivalent statistics and data interpretation [PDF]

open access: yesBehavior Research Methods, 2016
Recent reform efforts in psychological science have led to a plethora of choices for scientists to analyze their data. A scientist making an inference about their data must now decide whether to report a p value, summarize the data with a standardized effect size and its confidence interval, report a Bayes Factor, or use other model comparison methods.
openaire   +3 more sources

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Clinical versus statistical significance

open access: yesPerspectives in Clinical Research, 2015
In clinical research, study results, which are statistically significant are often interpreted as being clinically important. While statistical significance indicates the reliability of the study results, clinical significance reflects its impact on ...
Priya Ranganathan   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Nonparametric statistical tests for the continuous data: the basic concept and the practical use [PDF]

open access: yesKorean Journal of Anesthesiology, 2016
Conventional statistical tests are usually called parametric tests. Parametric tests are used more frequently than nonparametric tests in many medical articles, because most of the medical researchers are familiar with and the statistical software ...
Francis Sahngun Nahm
doaj   +1 more source

Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The perils of multiple testing

open access: yesPerspectives in Clinical Research, 2016
Multiple testing refers to situations where a dataset is subjected to statistical testing multiple times - either at multiple time-points or through multiple subgroups or for multiple end-points. This amplifies the probability of a false-positive finding.
Priya Ranganathan   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Testing Linear Regressions by StatsModel Library of Python for Oceanological Data Interpretation

open access: yesAQUATIC SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019
The study area is focused on the Mariana Trench, west Pacific Ocean. The research aim is to investigate correlation between various factors, such as bathymetric depths, geomorphic shape, geographic location on four tectonic plates of the sampling points ...
Polina Lemenkova
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Interpretation and identification of within-unit and cross-sectional variation in panel data models

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2020
While fixed effects (FE) models are often employed to address potential omitted variables, we argue that these models’ real utility is in isolating a particular dimension of variance from panel data for analysis.
J. Kropko, R. Kubinec
semanticscholar   +1 more source

Statistical Inference: The Big Picture [PDF]

open access: yesStatistical Science 2011, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1-9, 2011
Statistics has moved beyond the frequentist-Bayesian controversies of the past. Where does this leave our ability to interpret results? I suggest that a philosophy compatible with statistical practice, labeled here statistical pragmatism, serves as a foundation for inference.
arxiv   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy