Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching. [PDF]
Mem Cognit, 2022 AbstractModality compatibility (MC) describes the similarity between the modality of the stimulus and the modality of the anticipated response effect (e.g., auditory effects when speaking). Switching between two incompatible modality mappings (visual-vocal and auditory-manual) typically leads to larger costs than switching between two compatible ...
Friedgen E, Koch I, Stephan DN.
europepmc +5 more sources
Heaviness-brightness correspondence and stimulus-response compatibility. [PDF]
Atten Percept Psychophys, 2020 AbstractCross-sensory correspondences can reflect crosstalk between aligned conceptual feature dimensions, though uncertainty remains regarding the identities of all the dimensions involved. It is unclear, for example, if heaviness contributes to correspondences separately from size. Taking steps to dissociate variations in heaviness from variations in
Walker P, Scallon G, Francis BJ.
europepmc +5 more sources
Stimulus-Response Compatibility effect in the near-far dimension: A developmental study [PDF]
Frontiers in Psychology, 2016 The present study investigates the developmental aspect of stimulus-response compatibility effect in 8 to 11-years-old children. The task consisted in manually responding to the colour of a pawn presented on a chessboard at different distances.
Aurélien Richez +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms [PDF]
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2015 Stimulus position is coded even if it is task-irrelevant, leading to faster response times when the stimulus and the response locations are compatible (spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility – spatial SRC).
Marianna eAmbrosecchia +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels. [PDF]
Atten Percept Psychophys, 2018 When we observe someone else speaking, we tend to automatically activate the corresponding speech motor patterns. When listening, we therefore covertly imitate the observed speech. Simulation theories of speech perception propose that covert imitation of speech motor patterns supports speech perception.
Adank P +3 more
europepmc +8 more sources
The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility
Acta Psychologica, 2022 The well-known Stroop, Simon, and Eriksen flanker effects reflect the influence of an irrelevant dimension of a stimulus on task performance. In contrast, this study investigated the effect of an irrelevant (color) dimension of a response on performance.
Kangyin Shi, Ling Wang
doaj +1 more source
Reference valence effects of affective s-R compatibility: are visual and auditory results consistent? [PDF]
PLoS ONE, 2014 Humans may be faster to avoid negative words than to approach negative words, and faster to approach positive words than to avoid positive words. That is an example of affective stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility.
Zhao Xiaojun +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Proprioception and Stimulus-Response Compatibility [PDF]
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 2000 Sixteen subjects pressed a left or right key in response to lateralized visual stimuli, in uncrossed (left index finger on left key, right finger on right key) and crossed conditions (left finger on right key and vice versa), with varying finger separations.
Worringham, Charles, Kerr, Graham
openaire +2 more sources
Crossmodal Effects in Task Switching: Modality Compatibility with Vocal and Pedal Responses
Journal of Cognition, 2021 Modality compatibility refers to the similarity between the stimulus modality and the modality of response-related sensory consequences (e.g., vocal output produces audible effects).
Denise Nadine Stephan +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Stimulus-Response Compatibility Is Information-Action Compatibility [PDF]
Ecological Psychology, 1997 Stimulus-response compatibility experiments usually employ simple stimuli (e.g., colored lights) and simple responses (e.g., keypresses). The ecological approach to perception and action, on the other hand, emphasizes higher order quantities, information, and action.
Stins, J.F., Michaels, C.F.
openaire +1 more source