Results 31 to 40 of about 14,864 (256)

Effects of self-instructed stimulus-affect plans on indirectly measured and self-reported evaluative responses

open access: yesActa Psychologica, 2022
Repeatedly experiencing a specific stimulus-affect contingency influences subsequent evaluative responses towards the respective stimulus (e.g., evaluative conditioning).
Torsten Martiny-Huenger, Jenny Roth
doaj   +1 more source

Imagery perspective in copying movement

open access: yesAsian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2022
Imagery is a cognitive process widely used for learning and performance of motor skills (Morris et al., 2005). In this study, we investigated Internal (IP) and External Imagery Perspectives (EP) and actual copying of movement to deepen understanding of ...
SJ Thanikkal, T Morris, J Ciorciari
doaj   +1 more source

The Negative Compatibility Effect with Relevant Masks: a Case for Automatic Motor Inhibition

open access: yesFrontiers in Psychology, 2013
For many years controversy has surrounded the so-called ‘negative compatibility effect’ (NCE), a surprising phenomenon whereby responses to a target stimulus are delayed when the target is preceded by an unconscious, response-compatible prime.
Brenda eOcampo, Matthew eFinkbeiner
doaj   +1 more source

Assessing Automatic Approach-Avoidance Behavior in an Immersive Virtual Environment

open access: yesFrontiers in Virtual Reality, 2021
The use of virtual reality (VR) promises enormous potential for studying human behavior. While approach and avoidance tendencies have been explored in various areas of basic and applied psychology, such as attitude and emotion research, basic learning ...
Juliane Degner   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: On the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses

open access: yesFrontiers in Psychology, 2015
Several emotion theorists suggest that valenced stimuli automatically trigger motivational orientations and thereby facilitate corresponding behavior. Positive stimuli were thought to activate approach motivational circuits which in turn primed approach ...
Julia eKozlik   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Effect anticipation affects perceptual, cognitive, and motor phases of response preparation: evidence from an event-related potential (ERP) study

open access: yesFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2016
The anticipation of action effects is a basic process that can be observed even for key-pressing responses in a stimulus-response paradigm. In Ziessler, Nattkemper and Vogt’s (2012) experiments participants first learned arbitrary effects of key-pressing
Neil Richard Harrison, Michael eZiessler
doaj   +1 more source

Need for space: the key distance effect depends on spatial stimulus configurations. [PDF]

open access: yesPLoS ONE, 2014
In numerous psychological experiments, participants classify stimuli by pressing response keys. According to Lakens, Schneider, Jostmann, and Schubert (2011), classification performance is affected by physical distance between response keys--indicating a
Melanie Jonas   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Stimulus–response compatibility and affective computing: a review [PDF]

open access: yesTheoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2007
Affective computing, a human–factors effort to investigate the merits of emotions while people are working with human–computer interfaces, is gaining momentum. Measures to quantify affect (or its influences) range from EEG, to measurements of autonomic–nervous–system responses (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure), to less objective self–reports.
Lemmens, P.M.C.   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Short-term pre-exposure to modality mappings: Modality-incompatible single-task exposure reduces modality-specific between-task crosstalk in task-switching

open access: yesActa Psychologica, 2022
Modality compatibility refers to the similarity of the stimulus modality and the modality of the sensory-response effect that the response produces (i.e., vocal responses produce auditory effects).
Denise Nadine Stephan   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Stimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech [PDF]

open access: yesMemory & Cognition, 1987
Subjects chose between sequences of one syllable (e.g.,/gi/vs./bi/), two syllables (e.g.,/gibi/ vs./gubu/), and three syllables (e.g.,/gibidi/ vs. gubudu/), when/i/sequences were signaled by high-pitched tones and/u] sequences were signaled by low-pitched tones (high compatibility), or the reverse (low compatibility).
D A, Rosenbaum   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy