Results 31 to 40 of about 14,864 (256)
Repeatedly experiencing a specific stimulus-affect contingency influences subsequent evaluative responses towards the respective stimulus (e.g., evaluative conditioning).
Torsten Martiny-Huenger, Jenny Roth
doaj +1 more source
Imagery perspective in copying movement
Imagery is a cognitive process widely used for learning and performance of motor skills (Morris et al., 2005). In this study, we investigated Internal (IP) and External Imagery Perspectives (EP) and actual copying of movement to deepen understanding of ...
SJ Thanikkal, T Morris, J Ciorciari
doaj +1 more source
The Negative Compatibility Effect with Relevant Masks: a Case for Automatic Motor Inhibition
For many years controversy has surrounded the so-called ‘negative compatibility effect’ (NCE), a surprising phenomenon whereby responses to a target stimulus are delayed when the target is preceded by an unconscious, response-compatible prime.
Brenda eOcampo, Matthew eFinkbeiner
doaj +1 more source
Assessing Automatic Approach-Avoidance Behavior in an Immersive Virtual Environment
The use of virtual reality (VR) promises enormous potential for studying human behavior. While approach and avoidance tendencies have been explored in various areas of basic and applied psychology, such as attitude and emotion research, basic learning ...
Juliane Degner +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Several emotion theorists suggest that valenced stimuli automatically trigger motivational orientations and thereby facilitate corresponding behavior. Positive stimuli were thought to activate approach motivational circuits which in turn primed approach ...
Julia eKozlik +2 more
doaj +1 more source
The anticipation of action effects is a basic process that can be observed even for key-pressing responses in a stimulus-response paradigm. In Ziessler, Nattkemper and Vogt’s (2012) experiments participants first learned arbitrary effects of key-pressing
Neil Richard Harrison, Michael eZiessler
doaj +1 more source
Need for space: the key distance effect depends on spatial stimulus configurations. [PDF]
In numerous psychological experiments, participants classify stimuli by pressing response keys. According to Lakens, Schneider, Jostmann, and Schubert (2011), classification performance is affected by physical distance between response keys--indicating a
Melanie Jonas +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Stimulus–response compatibility and affective computing: a review [PDF]
Affective computing, a human–factors effort to investigate the merits of emotions while people are working with human–computer interfaces, is gaining momentum. Measures to quantify affect (or its influences) range from EEG, to measurements of autonomic–nervous–system responses (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure), to less objective self–reports.
Lemmens, P.M.C. +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Modality compatibility refers to the similarity of the stimulus modality and the modality of the sensory-response effect that the response produces (i.e., vocal responses produce auditory effects).
Denise Nadine Stephan +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Stimulus-response compatibility in the programming of speech [PDF]
Subjects chose between sequences of one syllable (e.g.,/gi/vs./bi/), two syllables (e.g.,/gibi/ vs./gubu/), and three syllables (e.g.,/gibidi/ vs. gubudu/), when/i/sequences were signaled by high-pitched tones and/u] sequences were signaled by low-pitched tones (high compatibility), or the reverse (low compatibility).
D A, Rosenbaum +3 more
openaire +2 more sources

