Results 1 to 10 of about 15,672 (256)
The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility
Acta Psychologica, 2022 The well-known Stroop, Simon, and Eriksen flanker effects reflect the influence of an irrelevant dimension of a stimulus on task performance. In contrast, this study investigated the effect of an irrelevant (color) dimension of a response on performance.
Kangyin Shi, Ling Wang
doaj +5 more sources
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching. [PDF]
Mem Cognit, 2022 AbstractModality compatibility (MC) describes the similarity between the modality of the stimulus and the modality of the anticipated response effect (e.g., auditory effects when speaking). Switching between two incompatible modality mappings (visual-vocal and auditory-manual) typically leads to larger costs than switching between two compatible ...
Friedgen E, Koch I, Stephan DN.
europepmc +5 more sources
Heaviness-brightness correspondence and stimulus-response compatibility. [PDF]
Atten Percept Psychophys, 2020 AbstractCross-sensory correspondences can reflect crosstalk between aligned conceptual feature dimensions, though uncertainty remains regarding the identities of all the dimensions involved. It is unclear, for example, if heaviness contributes to correspondences separately from size. Taking steps to dissociate variations in heaviness from variations in
Walker P, Scallon G, Francis BJ.
europepmc +5 more sources
Stimulus-Response Compatibility effect in the near-far dimension: A developmental study [PDF]
Frontiers in Psychology, 2016 The present study investigates the developmental aspect of stimulus-response compatibility effect in 8 to 11-years-old children. The task consisted in manually responding to the colour of a pawn presented on a chessboard at different distances.
Aurélien Richez +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms [PDF]
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2015 Stimulus position is coded even if it is task-irrelevant, leading to faster response times when the stimulus and the response locations are compatible (spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility – spatial SRC).
Marianna eAmbrosecchia +3 more
doaj +2 more sources
Effects of stimulus response compatibility on covert imitation of vowels. [PDF]
Atten Percept Psychophys, 2018 When we observe someone else speaking, we tend to automatically activate the corresponding speech motor patterns. When listening, we therefore covertly imitate the observed speech. Simulation theories of speech perception propose that covert imitation of speech motor patterns supports speech perception.
Adank P +3 more
europepmc +8 more sources
Effects of aerobic exercise on approach–avoidance responses and prefrontal activity in individuals with tobacco dependence [PDF]
Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingObjectiveThis study examined whether smokers exhibit an approach bias toward smoking-related cues and investigated the effects of acute aerobic exercise on modifying this behavioral tendency and its associated prefrontal cortical activity.MethodsIn ...
Hongen Liu +6 more
doaj +2 more sources
Mental imagery yields stimulus–response compatibility
Acta Psychologica, 1998 The present paper provides evidence for stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility effects in visual mental images. In two experiments subjects either studied a simple map (Experiment 1) or read a verbal description of the same map (Experiment 2), and then responded after generating a mental image of the presented information.
M, Tlauka, F P, McKenna
exaly +3 more sources
Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference [PDF]
Perception & Psychophysics, 1983 The contribution of stimulus-response compatibility to Stroop interference was tested in an auditory version of the Stroop test. The words “high” and “low” were presented in high and low pitches with either the pitch or the word designated as the relevant dimension.
exaly +3 more sources
Proprioception and Stimulus-Response Compatibility [PDF]
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 2000 Sixteen subjects pressed a left or right key in response to lateralized visual stimuli, in uncrossed (left index finger on left key, right finger on right key) and crossed conditions (left finger on right key and vice versa), with varying finger separations.
Worringham, Charles, Kerr, Graham
openaire +2 more sources