Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects [PDF]
Background There is an expectation for stakeholders (including patients, the public, health professionals, and others) to be involved in research. Researchers are increasingly recognising that it is good practice to involve stakeholders in systematic ...
C Camden+18 more
core +2 more sources
Revisão sistemática na socialização do género na fase de educação da primeira infância [PDF]
Throughout the early childhood education stage, gender identity is established through the process of socialisation through which boys and girls acquire and construct stereotypes and stereotyped gender roles, in many cases dichotomised and sexist.
Carrasco Rueda, Ana Belén+2 more
core +1 more source
Characterising long COVID: a living systematic review
Background While it is now apparent clinical sequelae (long COVID) may persist after acute COVID-19, their nature, frequency and aetiology are poorly characterised.
M. Michelen+19 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
"This illness diminishes me. What it does is like theft" : A qualitative meta-synthesis of people's experiences of living with asthma [PDF]
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This review was funded through a Seed Grant from the Centre for Research Excellence in Severe Asthma, Australia. The Healthtalk resources included in the systematic review were produced by two of the co-authors on the systematic review ...
Eassey, Daniela+5 more
core +1 more source
Social capital and health: A systematic review of systematic reviews
There are many systematic reviews on social capital (SC) and various health outcomes, but each of these reviews shows one piece of the larger SC and health puzzle. The aim of this research was to systematically review systematic reviews on SC and health, in order to provide an overview of existing evidence and to identify strategies for future research.
Ehsan, Annahita+3 more
openaire +5 more sources
Systematic reviews for policy [PDF]
The authors argue that learning from existing evidence is a key skill both for researchers and policy makers. However, how do you go about accomplishing this? What are the key approaches, and how do you make the right choices? Additionally, what are the common pitfalls? This chapter gives the reader a guide to best practice in systematic reviews.
Gough, D, Tripney, J
openaire +2 more sources
Haematospermia – A Systematic Review [PDF]
Haematospermia (or haemospermia) is a distressing symptom in sexually active men. In most cases, it is caused by non-specific inflammation of the prostate and seminal vesicles. In a small percentage of men, however, it may be a manifestation of genito-urinary or systemic malignancy, in particular prostate cancer.
Vinod H. Nargund+2 more
openaire +5 more sources
Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? [PDF]
Systematic reviews are comprehensive reviews of the literature for a highly focused research question. These reviews are often treated as the highest form of evidence in evidence-based medicine, and are the key strategy to answer research questions in the medical field.
arxiv
A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates [PDF]
Clinical trial registries can be used to monitor the production of trial evidence and signal when systematic reviews become out of date. However, this use has been limited to date due to the extensive manual review required to search for and screen relevant trial registrations.
arxiv +1 more source
A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on the COVID-19 Pandemic [PDF]
COVID-19 a systemic inflammation involving multiple organs, affecting all age groups, with high mortality rate, severe adverse outcomes, and high economic burden need to be described. A systematic review of systematic reviews conducted. We searched PubMed, OVID Medline, Cochrane library, COVID-19 resource centers of N Engl.
openaire +3 more sources