Results 61 to 70 of about 71,426,321 (257)

MLA Research Agenda Systematic Reviews

, 2015
Most of the 15 systematic review teams provided one-page summaries of their progress to date in compiling systematic reviews on one of 15 top-ranked important research projects. This builds upon an earlier Delphi study that was reported here: Eldredge
Holmes, Heather N., Ascher, Marie T., Eldredge, Jonathan D.   +2 more
core   +1 more source

Writing and presenting a systematic review emphasizing the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews [PDF]

, 2018
BACKGROUND: The systematic review is a scientific method for identifying and presenting early research, quality assessment, and integration of their results.
Khayyati, Fariba; Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran, Pashaei, Tahereh; Assistant Professor, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran, Fathifar, Zahra; Library, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran, Shirzadi, Shayesteh; PhD Candidate, Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran   +3 more
core   +1 more source

The effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for permanent molars and premolars A critical assessment of existing systematic reviews and report of a new systematic review [PDF]

, 2013
Available for download at: http://mahara.qmul.ac.uk/view/view.php?id=16447Available for download at: http://mahara.qmul.ac.uk/view/view.php?id=16447Available for download at: http://mahara.qmul.ac.uk/view/view.php?id=16447Available for download at: http:/
Hurst, D, University of Oxford
core   +1 more source

Bypassing clinical research for secondary evidence synthesis: are systematic reviews replacing clinical research for medical students and residents in Pakistan?

Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses authored by medical students, residents and novice researchers in Pakistan.
Farooq Azam Rathore, Fareeha Farooq, Gohar Wajid   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

“We Cannot Talk as a Family”: Complexities of Survivorship Communication Among Hispanic/Latino Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer, Parents, and Clinicians

Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Background Young adult childhood cancer survivors (YA‐CCS) have an increased risk of treatment‐related health complications throughout their lives. Lifelong survivorship care is recommended, yet many YA‐CCS experience disruptions in care during pediatric‐to‐adult transitions and do not receive recommended survivorship care.
Kevin Shanchen Pu, Nicole Fernández‐Viña, Briana C. Martin‐Villa, Daniela Ramirez, Rebecca M. Lewinsohn, Mary Smith, Heidi Boynton, Lidia Schapira, Stephanie M. Smith   +8 more
wiley   +1 more source

An overview of systematic reviews in medical education and a focused review in prescribing [PDF]

, 2012
Background: Tertiary reviews (review of reviews) in medical education tend to focus on doctors, continuing education and professional practice. This paper provides a tertiary review of all areas of medical education at all levels.
Green, K.E., Torgerson, C., Taylor, C.A.
core   +1 more source

Evidence‐Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Febrile Neutropenia: Resource‐Sensitive Recommendations for the Asian Continent

Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a frequent and serious complication in children receiving cancer therapy. Standardizing FN management across Asia is challenging due to variable healthcare infrastructure, diagnostic capacity, and infection patterns; however, it could improve resource use and patient outcomes.
Joliza Patricia Cañeba, Shweta Bansal, Tea Reljic, Allyne Montecillo‐Aguelo, Hamidah Alias, Farrah Amaranto, Maria Stella Aquino‐Calingasan, Bambang Ardianto, Eggi Arguni, Sally Blair, Thi Tam Dang, Maria Beatriz Gepte, Samanmalee Gunasekara, Andini Handayani, Miriam Kimpo, Catherine G. Lam, Nawachai Lertvivatpong, Sergio Licona, Ana Loseo, Ratha Mlis, Vivian Moreno Berrio, Nguyen Hoai Anh, Anna Lisa Ong‐Lim, Ha Thu Pham, Krishna Sagar Sharma, Bun Sereyleak, Sally Jane G. Velasco‐Aro, Su Yadana, Ambuj Kumar, Sheena Mukkada   +29 more
wiley   +1 more source

Methodological criteria for the assessment of moderators in systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials : a consensus study [PDF]

, 2011
Background: Current methodological guidelines provide advice about the assessment of sub-group analysis within RCTs, but do not specify explicit criteria for assessment.
Clare Miles, Miles, C, Tamar Pincus, Froud Robert, Carnes, D, Underwood, Martin, Martin Underwood, Froud, Robert J., Taylor, Stephanie J.C., Dawn Carnes, Underwood Martin, Miles Clare, Underwood, M, Robert Froud, Pincus Tamar, Taylor, Stephanie, Taylor, Stephanie J C, Carnes, Dawn, Froud, R, Pincus, Tamar, Carnes Dawn, Pincus, T, Miles, Clare, Taylor, SJC, Taylor, Stephanie J. C., Taylor Stephanie JC, Stephanie JC Taylor, Froud, Robert   +27 more
core   +2 more sources

Abatacept for Prophylaxis of Acute and Chronic Graft‐Versus‐Host‐Disease in Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation—A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Cohort Studies

Pediatric Blood &Cancer, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Background Graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD) remains one of the most significant complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Abatacept, a selective T‐cell costimulation modulator, is a relatively novel prophylactic agent, though pediatric data remain limited.
Matthijs D. Kruizinga, Anne B. Verbeek, Caroline A. Lindemans, Emilie P. Buddingh   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

Systematic Reviews as Part of Doctoral Theses and for the Promotion to Associate Professor: A Descriptive Study of University Policies in Sweden

Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods
Background Almost a decade ago, about half of biomedical PhD programs across Europe specifically stated that systematic reviews could not be accepted as part of a doctoral thesis, illustrating limited merit value at that time.
Martin Ringsten, Lea Styrmisdottir, Matilda Naesström, Minna Johansson, Matteo Bruschettini, Susanna M. Wallerstedt   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source