Results 231 to 240 of about 185,129,089 (274)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
The Problem with the ‘Problem of Evil’
Religious Studies, 1994Current discussions of the ‘problem of evil’ vary greatly in atleast two ways. First, those involved in such discussions often differ on the exact nature of the problem. Some see it as primarily logical (deductive), some as primarily evidential (inductive), and still others as primarily psychological (personal, pastoral).1Second, those involved in such
null David, Randall Basinger
openaire +1 more source
Southwest Philosophy Review, 1988
In reference to the analysis of his own dreams, Pauli mentioned that he instinctively “repressed” the objective significance of the mystical-intuitive attitude, even though the importance of a position which is complementary to natural science had already become clear to him in principle.
openaire +2 more sources
In reference to the analysis of his own dreams, Pauli mentioned that he instinctively “repressed” the objective significance of the mystical-intuitive attitude, even though the importance of a position which is complementary to natural science had already become clear to him in principle.
openaire +2 more sources
2017
This paper asks how the prospects of an afterlife might affect how we approach the problem of evil, which is doubtless the foremost intellectual difficulty that theists face. The paper considers four possible afterlife theories, asking not whether they are true but how, if they are true, they might affect the problem of evil.
Jon Mayled +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
This paper asks how the prospects of an afterlife might affect how we approach the problem of evil, which is doubtless the foremost intellectual difficulty that theists face. The paper considers four possible afterlife theories, asking not whether they are true but how, if they are true, they might affect the problem of evil.
Jon Mayled +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 1962
HE problem of evil is a very simple problem to state. There is evil in the world; yet the world is said to be the creation of a good, omnipotent God. How is this possible? Surely a good, omnipotent being would have made a world that is free of evil of any kind.
openaire +1 more source
HE problem of evil is a very simple problem to state. There is evil in the world; yet the world is said to be the creation of a good, omnipotent God. How is this possible? Surely a good, omnipotent being would have made a world that is free of evil of any kind.
openaire +1 more source
2018
In this context, ‘evil’ is given the widest possible scope to signify all of life’s minuses. Within this range, philosophers and theologians distinguish ‘moral evils’ such as war, betrayal and cruelty from ‘natural evils’ such as earthquakes, floods and disease. Usually the inescapability of death is numbered among the greatest natural evils.
openaire +1 more source
In this context, ‘evil’ is given the widest possible scope to signify all of life’s minuses. Within this range, philosophers and theologians distinguish ‘moral evils’ such as war, betrayal and cruelty from ‘natural evils’ such as earthquakes, floods and disease. Usually the inescapability of death is numbered among the greatest natural evils.
openaire +1 more source
Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes?
Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 2004openaire +1 more source