Results 111 to 120 of about 399,823 (153)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 2011
AbstractPure time preference is a preference for something to come at one point in time rather than another merely because of when it occurs in time. In opposition to Sidgwick, Ramsey, Rawls, and Parfit we argue that it is not always irrational to be guided by pure time preferences. We argue that even if the mere difference of location in time is not a
Lowry, R.J., Peterson, M.B.
openaire +2 more sources
AbstractPure time preference is a preference for something to come at one point in time rather than another merely because of when it occurs in time. In opposition to Sidgwick, Ramsey, Rawls, and Parfit we argue that it is not always irrational to be guided by pure time preferences. We argue that even if the mere difference of location in time is not a
Lowry, R.J., Peterson, M.B.
openaire +2 more sources
2023
This comprehensive Dictionary brings together an extensive range of definitive terms in ecological economics. Assembling contributions from distinguished scholars, it provides an intellectual map to this evolving subject ranging from the practical to the philosophical.
openaire +3 more sources
This comprehensive Dictionary brings together an extensive range of definitive terms in ecological economics. Assembling contributions from distinguished scholars, it provides an intellectual map to this evolving subject ranging from the practical to the philosophical.
openaire +3 more sources
Journal of Population Economics, 2000 The observed practice of discounting the future should not be rationalised on the grounds of myopia or selfishness. A positive rate of pure time preference is necessary to ensure that heterogeneous generations are treated in an egalitarian fashion. A zero social discount rate would yield intertemporal allocations which are biased against the current ...
MARINI, GIANCARLO +1 more
openaire +3 more sources
Time Discounting and Time Preference:
Journal of Economic Literature, 2002This paper discusses the discounted utility (DU) model: its historical development, underlying assumptions, and "anomalies" - the empirical regularities that are inconsistent with its theoretical predictions. We then summarize the alternate theoretical formulations that have been advanced to address these anomalies.
Shane Frederick +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
1996
Abstract There is broad agreement that, in cost-effectiveness analyses, all future costs and health consequences should be stated in terms of their “present value” to the decision maker. Only then will the interventions’ cost-effectiveness ratios be appropriately adjusted for the differential timing of costs and consequences so that the ...
J Lipscomb, M C Weinstein, G W Torrance
openaire +1 more source
Abstract There is broad agreement that, in cost-effectiveness analyses, all future costs and health consequences should be stated in terms of their “present value” to the decision maker. Only then will the interventions’ cost-effectiveness ratios be appropriately adjusted for the differential timing of costs and consequences so that the ...
J Lipscomb, M C Weinstein, G W Torrance
openaire +1 more source
Separating Risk Preference and Time Preference
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012In the studies of decision making under risk and time, an increasingly important question is whether the utility representations should be the same for both circumstances. This study aims to test the separation between risk preference and time preference in a controlled laboratory setting, where subjects make intertemporal allocation decisions under ...
Bin Miao, Songfa Zhong
openaire +1 more source
Comment on “Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences”: Separating Risk and Time Preference
American Economic Review, 2015Andreoni and Sprenger (2012a,b) observe that utility functions are distinct for risk and time preferences, and show that their findings are consistent with a preference for certainty. We revisit this question in an enriched experimental setting in which subjects make intertemporal decisions under different risk conditions. The observed choice behavior
Miao, Bin, Zhong, Songfa
openaire +2 more sources
Theoria, 1999
L'A. souleve le probleme du changement des preferences dans le temps, au regard de la morale utilitariste qui se donne comme fin la satisfaction des desirs. L'A. examine les notions de partialite et de neutralite temporelles, de preference synchronique et de preference diachronique, appliquees aux personnes du passe, du present et des generations ...
openaire +1 more source
L'A. souleve le probleme du changement des preferences dans le temps, au regard de la morale utilitariste qui se donne comme fin la satisfaction des desirs. L'A. examine les notions de partialite et de neutralite temporelles, de preference synchronique et de preference diachronique, appliquees aux personnes du passe, du present et des generations ...
openaire +1 more source
Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences: Separating Risk and Time Preference: Comment
American Economic Review, 2015Andreoni and Sprenger (2012a,b) observe that utility functions are distinct for risk and time preferences, and show that their findings are consistent with a preference for certainty. We revisit this question in an enriched experimental setting in which subjects make intertemporal decisions under different risk conditions.
Bin Miao, Songfa Zhong
openaire +1 more source