Results 31 to 40 of about 123,660 (292)
On the Total Version of Triple Roman Domination in Graphs
In this paper, we describe the study of total triple Roman domination. Total triple Roman domination is an assignment of labels from {0,1,2,3,4} to the vertices of a graph such that every vertex is protected by at least three units either on itself or ...
Juan Carlos Valenzuela-Tripodoro +3 more
doaj +4 more sources
Complexity of signed total $k$-Roman domination problem in graphs
Let $G$ be a simple graph with finite vertex set $V(G)$ and $S=\{-1,1,2\}$. A signed total Roman $k$-dominating function (STRkDF) on a graph $G$ is a function $f:V(G)\to S$ such that (i) any vertex $y$ with $f(y)=-1$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $t$
Saeed Kosari +4 more
doaj +2 more sources
The signed (total) Roman domination problem on some classes of planar graphs— Convex polytopes [PDF]
In this paper we deal with the calculation of the signed (total) Roman domination numbers, $\gamma_{sR}$ and $\gamma_{stR}$ respectively, on a few classes of planar graphs from the literature.
Tatjana Zec +2 more
openalex +3 more sources
On the (total) Roman domination in Latin square graphs
Latin square, also known as Latin square matrix, refers to a kind of $ n\times n $ matrix, in which there are exactly $ n $ different symbols and each symbol appears exactly once in each row and column.
Chang-Xu Zhang +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Signed total Roman $k$-domination in directed graphs [PDF]
Let $D$ be a finite and simple digraph with vertex set $V(D)$. A signed total Roman $k$-dominating function (STR$k$DF) on $D$ is a function $f:V(D)\rightarrow\{-1, 1, 2\}$ satisfying the conditions that (i) $\sum_{x\in N^{-}(v)}f(x)\ge k ...
N. Dehgard, L. Volkmann
doaj +2 more sources
Total Weak Roman Domination in Graphs [PDF]
Given a graph G = ( V , E ) , a function f : V → { 0 , 1 , 2 , ⋯ } is said to be a total dominating function if ∑ u ∈ N ( v ) f ( u ) > 0 for every v ∈ V , where N ( v ) denotes the open neighbourhood of v. Let V i = { x ∈ V : f ( x ) = i } . We say that a function f : V → { 0 , 1 , 2 }
Abel Cabrera Martínez +2 more
openalex +3 more sources
Improved Total Domination and Total Roman Domination in Unit Disk Graphs
Let $G=(V, E)$ be a simple undirected graph with no isolated vertex. A set $D_t\subseteq V$ is a total dominating set of $G$ if $(i)$ $D_t$ is a dominating set, and $(ii)$ the set $D_t$ induces a subgraph with no isolated vertex. The total dominating set of minimum cardinality is called the minimum total dominating set, and the size of the minimum ...
Rout, Sasmita, Das, Gautam Kumar
openaire +3 more sources
Relating the Outer-Independent Total Roman Domination Number with Some Classical Parameters of Graphs [PDF]
For a given graph G without isolated vertex we consider a function f:V(G)→{0,1,2}\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage ...
Abel Cabrera Martínez +2 more
semanticscholar +6 more sources
Quasi total double Roman domination stability in graphs
A quasi total double Roman dominating function (QTDRD-function) on a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] having the property that [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text], then the vertex v must have at least two neighbors ...
Saeed Kosari, Hanxin Jiang, M. Esmaeili
doaj +2 more sources
Closed formulas for the total Roman domination number of lexicographic product graphs
Let G be a graph with no isolated vertex and f : V ( G ) → {0, 1, 2} a function. Let V i = { x ∈ V ( G ) : f ( x ) = i } for every i ∈ {0, 1, 2} . We say that f is a total Roman dominating function on G if every vertex in V 0 is adjacent to at least
Abel Cabrera Martínez +1 more
openalex +3 more sources

