Results 161 to 170 of about 36,986 (199)
An "ethics of strangers"? On knowing the patient in clinical ethics. [PDF]
Med Health Care PhilosBjörk J, Hirsch A.
europepmc +1 more source
Grounding the Selectionist Explanation for the Success of Science in the External Physical World. [PDF]
Found Scivan der Merwe R.
europepmc +1 more source
Capturing Argument in Agent-Based Models. [PDF]
Topoi (Dordr)Assaad L +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
2003
In The Uses of Argument (1958) proposed a new, dialectically grounded structure for the layout of arguments, replacing the old terminology of “premiss” and “conclusion” with a new set of terms: claim, data (later “grounds”), warrant, modal qualifier, rebuttal, backing.
openaire +1 more source
In The Uses of Argument (1958) proposed a new, dialectically grounded structure for the layout of arguments, replacing the old terminology of “premiss” and “conclusion” with a new set of terms: claim, data (later “grounds”), warrant, modal qualifier, rebuttal, backing.
openaire +1 more source
1989
There are several threads that make up the fabric of contemporary ethical theory from the 1950s to the present. One of these is the good reasons approach to ethics pioneered by Stephen Toulmin and developed by Kurt Baier.1 Another is the revival of social contract theory begun by John Rawls and extended to a wide range of practical problems by David ...
openaire +1 more source
There are several threads that make up the fabric of contemporary ethical theory from the 1950s to the present. One of these is the good reasons approach to ethics pioneered by Stephen Toulmin and developed by Kurt Baier.1 Another is the revival of social contract theory begun by John Rawls and extended to a wide range of practical problems by David ...
openaire +1 more source
Common Knowledge, 2011
In a memorial essay on the philosopher Stephen Toulmin (1922–2009), the author discusses ideas that he and Toulmin drew, over the years, from their reading and coteaching of Tolstoy. He speculates that Toulmin's interest in Tolstoy may have been encouraged by Wittgenstein, Toulmin's teacher and a lover of Tolstoy. All three men understood philosophy as
openaire +1 more source
In a memorial essay on the philosopher Stephen Toulmin (1922–2009), the author discusses ideas that he and Toulmin drew, over the years, from their reading and coteaching of Tolstoy. He speculates that Toulmin's interest in Tolstoy may have been encouraged by Wittgenstein, Toulmin's teacher and a lover of Tolstoy. All three men understood philosophy as
openaire +1 more source
1999
In The Uses of Argument (1958), Stephen Toulmin introduces his argumentation model. The central question in this book is which norms must be applied in evaluating argumentation. According to Toulmin, the logical criterion of formal validity is not adequate for the evaluation of arguments in everyday language because it does not take into account the ...
openaire +1 more source
In The Uses of Argument (1958), Stephen Toulmin introduces his argumentation model. The central question in this book is which norms must be applied in evaluating argumentation. According to Toulmin, the logical criterion of formal validity is not adequate for the evaluation of arguments in everyday language because it does not take into account the ...
openaire +1 more source
Argumentationstheorie nach Toulmin
1997Wie auch die Argumentationstheorie von Perelman und Olbrechts — Tyteca entstand die Theorie von Toulmin [195889] aus der Kritik an der formalen Logik, so das auch er sich an der Argumentationspraxis orientiert90. Sein Schwerpunkt liegt jedoch auf den in einer Argumentation geltenden Bedingungen fur die Annahme und Ablehnung eines Arguments [Johnstone ...
openaire +1 more source
Systematizing Toulmin's Warrants: An Epistemic Approach
Argumentation, 2005Relevance of premises to conclusion can be explicated through Toulmin’s notion of warrant, understood as an inference rule, albeit not necessarily formal. A normative notion of relevance requires the warrant to be reliable. To determine reliability, we propose a fourfold classification of warrants into a priori, empirical, institutional, and evaluative,
openaire +1 more source