Results 11 to 20 of about 8,858,515 (288)
Traditional methods for selecting web pages for evaluation lack a systematic approach. Web accessibility is crucial to improve equal access and usability for individuals with disabilities. However, current approaches to accessibility evaluation are often time-consuming and resource-intensive.
Alexander Hambley +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Disabled people and the Web: User-based measurement of accessibility [PDF]
Being able to use websites is an important aspect of every-day life to most people, including disabled people. However, despite the existence of technical guidelines for accessibility for more than a decade, disabled users still find problems using ...
Freire, André Pimenta
core +6 more sources
EWA-Evaluation web accessibility
The purpose of this work was to improve the automated Web accessibility evaluation, considering that: evaluation should target what the end users perceive and interact with; evaluation results should address accessibility problems in a focused, uncluttered, way; and results should reflect the quality adequately to the stakeholders.
Fernandes, Nádia Raquel Palma
openaire +2 more sources
SemanticWeb enabled web accessibility evaluation tools
Evaluating Web sites for accessibility remains an effort intensive process. Potentially, evaluation tools can significantly improve the efficiency and quality of Web accessibility evaluations but the currently available tool market only provides little or no consistency in the reliability and performance amongst these tools.
Shadi Abou-Zahra, Shadi Abou-Zahra World
openaire +2 more sources
Requirements for Large Scale Web Accessibility Evaluation [PDF]
Abstract The recent European legislation emphasizes the importance of enabling people with disabilities to have access to online information and services of public sector bodies. To this regard, automatic evaluation and monitoring of Web accessibility can play a key role for various stakeholders involved in creating and maintaining over time accessible
Paternò F +4 more
europepmc +7 more sources
A comparative test of web accessibility evaluation methods
Accessibility auditors have to choose a method when evaluating accessibility: expert review (a.k.a. conformance testing), user testing, subjective evaluations, barrier walkthrough are some possibilities. However, little is known to date about their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Giorgio Brajnik, BRAJNIK, Giorgio
openaire +3 more sources
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 [PDF]
Aquesta és una traducció catalana autoritzada d'un document del W3C. La publicació d'aquesta traducció ha seguit els passos descrits en la política de traduccions autoritzades W3C.
Térmens i Graells, Miquel +2 more
core +7 more sources
Evaluating the web accessibility of IIT libraries: a study of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines [PDF]
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate and identify the status of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) conformance levels (A, AA, AAA) and accessibility status in terms of Severity (Error, Warning and Review) and Responsibility (Editor, Webmaster and Developer) of Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) Library websites based on ...
Panda, Subhajit, Chakravarty, Rupak
openaire +2 more sources
Determination and evaluation of Web accessibility [PDF]
The Web is the most pervasive collaborative technology in widespread use today; however, access to the Web and its many applications cannot be taken for granted. Web accessibility encompasses a variety of concerns ranging from societal, political, and economic to individual, physical, and intellectual through to the purely technical.
openaire +2 more sources
Evaluating the Accessibility of Web Applications
AbstractThe Web has been growing in size and complexity and is used for the most diverse activities in our everyday life, becoming almost indispensable. Besides, Web applications are becoming more popular, and consequently used by a wide range of people.
Nádia Fernandes +3 more
openaire +1 more source

