Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World [PDF]
Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks.
Raminta Pranckutė
openalex +2 more sources
Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity [PDF]
Web of Science (WoS) is the world’s oldest, most widely used and authoritative database of research publications and citations. Based on the Science Citation Index, founded by Eugene Garfield in 1964, it has expanded its selective, balanced, and complete
Caroline Birkle +3 more
openalex +2 more sources
A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases [PDF]
Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems
Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo (409257) +7 more
core +12 more sources
Bounding the Number of Minimal Transversals in Tripartite 3-Uniform Hypergraphs [PDF]
We focus on the maximum number of minimal transversals in 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs on n vertices. Those hypergraphs (and their minimal transversals) are commonly found in database applications.
Alexandre Bazin +3 more
doaj +1 more source
The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis [PDF]
Traditionally, Web of Science and Scopus have been the two most widely used databases for bibliometric analyses. However, during the last few years some new scholarly databases, such as Dimensions, have come up.
V. Singh +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Chatbots and ChatGPT: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Publications in Web of Science and Scopus Databases [PDF]
This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature related to chatbots, focusing specifically on ChatGPT. Chatbots have gained increasing attention recently, with an annual growth rate of 19.16% and 27.19% on the Web of Sciences ...
H. Khosravi +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations [PDF]
New sources of citation data have recently become available, such as Microsoft Academic, Dimensions, and the OpenCitations Index of CrossRef open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI).
Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic [PDF]
We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic.
M. Visser, Nees Jan van Eck, L. Waltman
semanticscholar +1 more source
Visual Summary Identification From Scientific Publications via Self-Supervised Learning
The exponential growth of scientific literature yields the need to support users to both effectively and efficiently analyze and understand the some body of research work.
Shintaro Yamamoto +4 more
doaj +1 more source
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis [PDF]
Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research evaluation. Most bibliometric analyses have in common their data sources: Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science (WoS) and Elsevier’s Scopus.
P. Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus
semanticscholar +1 more source

