Materials Science Resources on the Web.
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2002 This guide to materials sciences resources includes reference tools and educational resources related to materials that are freely available on the Internet and do not require subscription or registration on the part of individual researchers to access them.
Lorraine J. Pellack
openaire +3 more sources
The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis [PDF]
Scientometrics, 2020 Traditionally, Web of Science and Scopus have been the two most widely used databases for bibliometric analyses. However, during the last few years some new scholarly databases, such as Dimensions, have come up.
V. Singh +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Chatbots and ChatGPT: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Publications in Web of Science and Scopus Databases [PDF]
International Journal of Data Mining Modelling and Management, 2023 This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature related to chatbots, focusing specifically on ChatGPT. Chatbots have gained increasing attention recently, with an annual growth rate of 19.16% and 27.19% on the Web of Sciences ...
H. Khosravi +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations [PDF]
Scientometrics, 2020 New sources of citation data have recently become available, such as Microsoft Academic, Dimensions, and the OpenCitations Index of CrossRef open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI).
Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World
Publ., 2021 Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks.
Raminta Pranckute
semanticscholar +1 more source
Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic [PDF]
Quantitative Science Studies, 2020 We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic.
M. Visser, Nees Jan van Eck, L. Waltman
semanticscholar +1 more source
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis [PDF]
Scientometrics, 2015 Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research evaluation. Most bibliometric analyses have in common their data sources: Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science (WoS) and Elsevier’s Scopus.
P. Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus
semanticscholar +1 more source
Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2023 Objective: This follow-up study aims to determine if and how the coverage of funding information in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) and Scopus changed from 2015 to 2021.
P. Kokol
semanticscholar +1 more source
Combining Web of Science and Scopus datasets in citation-based literature study
Scientometrics, 2022 Scientific research builds on previous studies and scientifically proven knowledge. Researchers must master the recent developments in the field when designing research to answer new questions.
Miika Kumpulainen, M. Seppänen
semanticscholar +1 more source
STEAM in education: a bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science
International Journal of STEM Education, 2021 Emerging methodologies that apply and integrate science, technology, engineering, art, and math (STEAM) in education have appeared in recent years as a pedagogical alternative providing more holistic and attractive education.
José-Antonio Marín-Marín +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source