A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases [PDF]
arXiv.org, 2013 Nowadays, the world’s scientific community has been publishing an enormous number of papers in different scientific fields. In such environment, it is essential to know which databases are equally efficient and objective for literature searches. It seems
A. Chadegani +6 more
semanticscholar +14 more sources
Bounding the Number of Minimal Transversals in Tripartite 3-Uniform Hypergraphs [PDF]
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science, 2023 We focus on the maximum number of minimal transversals in 3-partite 3-uniform hypergraphs on n vertices. Those hypergraphs (and their minimal transversals) are commonly found in database applications.
Alexandre Bazin +3 more
doaj +1 more source
The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis [PDF]
Scientometrics, 2020 Traditionally, Web of Science and Scopus have been the two most widely used databases for bibliometric analyses. However, during the last few years some new scholarly databases, such as Dimensions, have come up.
V. Singh +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of the Status of Scleral Lens Research Based on the Web of Science Database and Scopus Database (2014-2024). [PDF]
Clin Optom (Auckl)Yin M +7 more
europepmc +3 more sources
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today's Academic World
Publ., 2021 Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks.
Raminta Pranckute
semanticscholar +1 more source
Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations [PDF]
Scientometrics, 2020 New sources of citation data have recently become available, such as Microsoft Academic, Dimensions, and the OpenCitations Index of CrossRef open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI).
Alberto Mart'in-Mart'in +3 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Chatbots and ChatGPT: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Publications in Web of Science and Scopus Databases [PDF]
International Journal of Data Mining Modelling and Management, 2023 This paper presents a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature related to chatbots, focusing specifically on ChatGPT. Chatbots have gained increasing attention recently, with an annual growth rate of 19.16% and 27.19% on the Web of Sciences ...
H. Khosravi +4 more
semanticscholar +1 more source
Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic [PDF]
Quantitative Science Studies, 2020 We present a large-scale comparison of five multidisciplinary bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic.
M. Visser, Nees Jan van Eck, L. Waltman
semanticscholar +1 more source
Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education, 2011 Academic disciplines which practice in the context of rapid external change face particular problems when seeking to maintain timely, current and relevant teaching programs. In different institutions faculty will tune and update individual component courses while more radical revisions are typically departmental-wide strategic responses to perceived ...
White, Su, Vafapoulos, Michalis
openaire +2 more sources
The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis [PDF]
Scientometrics, 2015 Bibliometric methods are used in multiple fields for a variety of purposes, namely for research evaluation. Most bibliometric analyses have in common their data sources: Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science (WoS) and Elsevier’s Scopus.
P. Mongeon, Adèle Paul-Hus
semanticscholar +1 more source