Results 31 to 40 of about 117 (76)
Double machine learning and automated confounder selection: A cautionary tale
Double machine learning (DML) has become an increasingly popular tool for automated variable selection in high-dimensional settings. Even though the ability to deal with a large number of potential covariates can render selection-on-observables ...
Hünermund Paul +2 more
doaj +1 more source
Role of placebo samples in observational studies
In an observational study, it is common to leverage known null effects to detect bias. One such strategy is to set aside a placebo sample – a subset of data immune from the hypothesized cause-and-effect relationship. Existence of an effect in the placebo
Ye Ting +3 more
doaj +1 more source
From urn models to box models: Making Neyman's (1923) insights accessible
Neyman’s 1923 paper introduced the potential outcomes framework and the foundations of randomization-based inference. We discuss the influence of Neyman’s paper on four introductory to intermediate-level textbooks by Berkeley faculty members (Scheffé ...
Lin Winston +3 more
doaj +1 more source
In the presence of heterogeneity between the randomized controlled trial (RCT) participants and the target population, evaluating the treatment effect solely based on the RCT often leads to biased quantification of the real-world treatment effect.
Lee Dasom, Yang Shu, Wang Xiaofei
doaj +1 more source
Conditional generative adversarial networks for individualized causal mediation analysis
Most classical methods popularly used in causal mediation analysis can only estimate the average causal effects and are difficult to apply to precision medicine.
Huan Cheng, Sun Rongqian, Song Xinyuan
doaj +1 more source
Sensitivity analysis for causal effects with generalized linear models
Residual confounding is a common source of bias in observational studies. In this article, we build upon a series of sensitivity analyses methods for residual confounding developed by Brumback et al. and Chiba whose sensitivity parameters are constructed
Sjölander Arvid +2 more
doaj +1 more source
The built-in selection bias of hazard ratios formalized using structural causal models [PDF]
It is known that the hazard ratio lacks a useful causal interpretation. Even for data from a randomized controlled trial, the hazard ratio suffers from so-called built-in selection bias as, over time, the individuals at risk among the exposed and ...
Post, Richard A.J. +2 more
core +1 more source
Prospective and retrospective causal inferences based on the potential outcome framework
In this article, we discuss both prospective and retrospective causal inferences, building on Neyman’s potential outcome framework. For prospective causal inference, we review criteria for confounders and surrogates to avoid the Yule–Simpson paradox and ...
Geng Zhi +4 more
doaj +1 more source
The d-separation criterion in Categorical Probability
The d-separation criterion detects the compatibility of a joint probability distribution with a directed acyclic graph through certain conditional independences.
Fritz, Tobias, Klingler, Andreas
core
An optimal transport approach to estimating causal effects via nonlinear difference-in-differences
We propose a nonlinear difference-in-differences (DiD) method to estimate multivariate counterfactual distributions in classical treatment and control study designs with observational data.
Torous William +2 more
doaj +1 more source

