Results 1 to 10 of about 24,926 (214)
A note on a sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding, and the related E-value
Unmeasured confounding is one of the most important threats to the validity of observational studies. In this paper we scrutinize a recently proposed sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.
Sjölander Arvid
doaj +1 more source
Statins and Mortality in COPD: A Methodological Review of Observational Studies
Randomized controlled trials and observational studies have reported conflicting results on the potential beneficial effects of statins on mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Naheemot Olaoluwa Sule, Samy Suissa
doaj +1 more source
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the influence of unobserved individual characteristics in explaining the effects of work-related factors on full (fSA) and part-time sickness absence (pSA). METHODS: We used register-based panel data for the period 2005–
Elli Hartikainen +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Simple yet sharp sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
We present a method for assessing the sensitivity of the true causal effect to unmeasured confounding. The method requires the analyst to set two intuitive parameters. Otherwise, the method is assumption free. The method returns an interval that contains
Peña Jose M.
doaj +1 more source
Recovery and inference of causal effects with sequential adjustment for confounding and attrition
Confounding bias and selection bias bring two significant challenges to the validity of conclusions drawn from applied causal inference. The latter can stem from informative missingness, such as in cases of attrition.
de Aguas Johan +3 more
doaj +1 more source
The Entry of Randomized Assignment into the Social Sciences
Although the concept of randomized assignment in order to control for extraneous confounding factors reaches back hundreds of years, the first empirical use appears to have been in an 1835 trial of homeopathic medicine.
Jamison Julian C.
doaj +1 more source
Information Theoretic Causal Effect Quantification
Modelling causal relationships has become popular across various disciplines. Most common frameworks for causality are the Pearlian causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and the Neyman-Rubin potential outcome framework.
Aleksander Wieczorek, Volker Roth
doaj +1 more source
Merete Osler,1,2 Ida Kim Wium-Andersen,1,3 Martin Balslev Jørgensen,3 Terese Sara Høj Jørgensen,1,2 Marie Kim Wium-Andersen1 1Research Center for Prevention and Health, Rigshospitalet – Glostrup, Copenhagen University, Glostrup,
Osler M +4 more
doaj
Bias assessment in systematic reviews of observational studies commonly includes consideration about whether key confounders were controlled but rarely evaluates whether control strategies may have introduced bias through control of colliders or ...
Brayan Alexander Fonseca Martinez +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Background The relation between obesity, blood pressure (BP) and bladder cancer (BC) risk and mortality remains unclear, partially due to potential confounding by smoking, the strongest risk factor for BC, and not accounting for tumor stage and grade in ...
Stanley Teleka +7 more
doaj +1 more source

