Results 161 to 170 of about 35,376 (211)
Peer review: the imprimatur of scientific publication. [PDF]
Exp PhysiolBerg RMG +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
De argumenten ad verecumdiam en ad hominem
Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing, 1991 openaire +1 more source
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Ad hominem argumentation in politics
Philosophy & Social Criticism, 2018A healthy and robust public political culture is generally regarded as being of utmost necessity for the maintenance of a stable democratic environment. Especially when a country is facing significant challenges and is in the process of devising and implementing radical reforms, the presence of satisfactory collective deliberation can ensure ...
openaire +3 more sources
Ad hominem rhetoric in scientific psychology
British Journal of Psychology, 2021Abstract Ad hominem discourse is largely prohibited in scientific journals. Historically, this prohibition restricted the dissemination of ad hominem discussion, but during the last decade, blogs and social media platforms became popular among researchers.
openaire +2 more sources
The Journal of Communication and Religion, 2018
This essay explores the apologetic value of arguments for faith that are built upon premises accepted by the skeptic—the kind of argument originally denoted by the term ad hominem. I illustrate the apologetic efficacy of ad hominem argument by working with the premise of ‘factuality.’ The skeptic supposes that facts may lead to scientific inferences ...
openaire +1 more source
This essay explores the apologetic value of arguments for faith that are built upon premises accepted by the skeptic—the kind of argument originally denoted by the term ad hominem. I illustrate the apologetic efficacy of ad hominem argument by working with the premise of ‘factuality.’ The skeptic supposes that facts may lead to scientific inferences ...
openaire +1 more source
Computational Ad Hominem Detection
Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop, 2019Fallacies like the personal attack—also known as the ad hominem attack—are introduced in debates as an easy win, even though they provide no rhetorical contribution. Although their importance in argumentation mining is acknowledged, automated mining and analysis is still lacking.
Pieter Delobelle +4 more
openaire +1 more source
2004
Abstract Nietzsche often employs ad hominem arguments, usually considered fallacies by most philosophers and logic teachers. But I argue that Nietzsche makes good use of these on the grounds that in philosophy, at least, a person’s character is certainly relevant to his or her moral claims and theories. Ad hominem arguments have also bee
openaire +1 more source
Abstract Nietzsche often employs ad hominem arguments, usually considered fallacies by most philosophers and logic teachers. But I argue that Nietzsche makes good use of these on the grounds that in philosophy, at least, a person’s character is certainly relevant to his or her moral claims and theories. Ad hominem arguments have also bee
openaire +1 more source
2019
Der Begriff „argumentum ad hominem“ stammt aus dem Lateinischen und bedeutet frei ubersetzt „Beweisrede gegen den Menschen“. Anstelle einer guten logischen Argumentation ersetzen Ad Hominems die logische Argumentation durch eine Angriffssprache, die nichts mit der Wahrheit zu tun hat.
openaire +1 more source
Der Begriff „argumentum ad hominem“ stammt aus dem Lateinischen und bedeutet frei ubersetzt „Beweisrede gegen den Menschen“. Anstelle einer guten logischen Argumentation ersetzen Ad Hominems die logische Argumentation durch eine Angriffssprache, die nichts mit der Wahrheit zu tun hat.
openaire +1 more source
2019
Emotional arguments (ad hominem) are messages directed to attacking a person, sidestepping the logical argument. In parliament, members of Parliament (MPs) use emotional arguments and language to influence their opponent or audience attitudes and behavior.
Justina Latenda Amakali +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Emotional arguments (ad hominem) are messages directed to attacking a person, sidestepping the logical argument. In parliament, members of Parliament (MPs) use emotional arguments and language to influence their opponent or audience attitudes and behavior.
Justina Latenda Amakali +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Beware the “argumentum ad hominem”
Roeper Review, 1986The problem solving methods of two fifth grade boys who found themselves in a curriculum quandry are examined. One used the “argumentum ad hominem,” an argument directed against an individual in what must be seen as a vehement attack. The other used the “argumentum ad rem,” an argument directed only at the issues. The author asserts that the ad hominem
openaire +1 more source