Results 1 to 10 of about 16,929 (183)

Argument ad hominem, argument ad personam i atak osobisty – analiza porównawcza

open access: yesRes Rhetorica, 2023
Wiele współczesnych źródeł, od internetowych kursów krytycznego myślenia do podręczników do logiki uznanych autorów, zdaje się pomijać istotną różnicę między trzema różnymi pojęciami: argumentami ad hominem, argumentami ad personam i atakami ad personam
Jakub Pruś
doaj   +2 more sources

Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2015
Argumentation theorists are beginning to think of ad hominem arguments as generally legitimate. Virtue argumentation theorists argue that a character trait approach to argument appraisal can explain why ad hominems would are legitimate, when they are ...
Patrick Bondy
doaj   +5 more sources

Perelman, argument ad hominem et ethos rhétorique [PDF]

open access: yesArgumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2009
Perelman’s view of the role of persons in argument is one of the most distinctive features of his break with Cartesian assumptions about reasoning. Whereas the Rationalist paradigm sought to minimize or eliminate personal considerations by dismissing ...
Michael Leff
doaj   +3 more sources

Annotating Argument Schemes. [PDF]

open access: yesArgumentation, 2021
Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between premise(s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional patterns of reasoning is essential to the interpretation and evaluation of ...
Visser J   +4 more
europepmc   +7 more sources

Attacking Character: Ad Hominem Argument and Virtue Epistemology

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2010
The recent literature on ad hominem argument contends that the speaker’s character is sometimes relevant to evaluating what she says. This effort to redeem ad hominems requires an analysis of character that explains why and how character is relevant.
Heather Battaly
doaj   +3 more sources

Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic

open access: yesInformal Logic, 2001
This is a critical examination of Johnstone's thesis that all valid philosophical arguments are ad hominem. I clarify his notions of valid, philosophical, and ad hominem. I illustrate the thesis with his refutation ofthe claim that only ordinary language
Maurice A. Finocchiaro
doaj   +3 more sources

Destrukcja wizerunku publicznego w dyskursie. Rola argumentu ad hominem w komentarzach internautów dotyczących polskiej pisarki Olgi Tokarczuk

open access: yesRes Rhetorica, 2022
Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza destrukcji wizerunku osoby w dyskursie na przykładzie użycia argumentu ad hominem w komentarzach internautów dotyczących nagrody Nobla 2018 przyznanej w dziedzinie literatury polskiej pisarce i intelektualistce ...
Joanna Koswenda, Jolanta Dyoniziak
doaj   +1 more source

Thou Shalt Not Squander Life – Comparing Five Approaches to Argument Strength

open access: yesStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2023
Different approaches analyze the strength of a natural language argument in different ways. This paper contrasts the dialectical, structural, probabilistic (or Bayesian), computational, and empirical approaches by exemplarily applying them to a single ...
Zenker Frank   +4 more
doaj   +1 more source

La dissonnance dans le dissensus : manifestations et conséquences argumentatives d’une attaque psychologisante

open access: yesArgumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2021
The objective of this paper is to describe the argumentative use of the expression "cognitive dissonance" on the social network Twitter. The descriptive approach which is developped here aims to report on the use of this lexeme in the context of ...
Leslie Pison
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy