Results 1 to 10 of about 66 (59)
Perelman, argument ad hominem et ethos rhétorique
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2009 Perelman’s view of the role of persons in argument is one of the most distinctive features of his break with Cartesian assumptions about reasoning. Whereas the Rationalist paradigm sought to minimize or eliminate personal considerations by dismissing ...
Michael Leff
doaj +3 more sources
Res Rhetorica, 2022 Celem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza destrukcji wizerunku osoby w dyskursie na przykładzie użycia argumentu ad hominem w komentarzach internautów dotyczących nagrody Nobla 2018 przyznanej w dziedzinie literatury polskiej pisarce i intelektualistce ...
Joanna Koswenda, Jolanta Dyoniziak
doaj +1 more source
Argument ad hominem, argument ad personam i atak osobisty – analiza porównawcza
Res Rhetorica, 2023 Wiele współczesnych źródeł, od internetowych kursów krytycznego myślenia do podręczników do logiki uznanych autorów, zdaje się pomijać istotną różnicę między trzema różnymi pojęciami: argumentami ad hominem, argumentami ad personam i atakami ad personam
Jakub Pruś
doaj +1 more source
Virtues, Evidence, and Ad Hominem Arguments
Informal Logic, 2015 Argumentation theorists are beginning to think of ad hominem arguments as generally legitimate. Virtue argumentation theorists argue that a character trait approach to argument appraisal can explain why ad hominems would are legitimate, when they are ...
Patrick Bondy
doaj +3 more sources
Thou Shalt Not Squander Life – Comparing Five Approaches to Argument Strength
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2023 Different approaches analyze the strength of a natural language argument in different ways. This paper contrasts the dialectical, structural, probabilistic (or Bayesian), computational, and empirical approaches by exemplarily applying them to a single ...
Zenker Frank +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Valid Ad Hominem Arguments in Philosophy: Johnstone's Metaphilosophical Informal Logic
Informal Logic, 2001 This is a critical examination of Johnstone's thesis that all valid philosophical arguments are ad hominem. I clarify his notions of valid, philosophical, and ad hominem. I illustrate the thesis with his refutation ofthe claim that only ordinary language
Maurice A. Finocchiaro
doaj +1 more source
Journalism and Media, 2022 The current paper studies the 2022 parliamentary election campaign, in regards to what extent and quality certain elements of political debate can appear in political actors’ social media communication.
Vanessza Juhász, Márton Bene
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2021 The objective of this paper is to describe the argumentative use of the expression "cognitive dissonance" on the social network Twitter. The descriptive approach which is developped here aims to report on the use of this lexeme in the context of ...
Leslie Pison
doaj +1 more source
Revision and Immortality in Philosophical Argumentation: Continuing Thoughts on the Rhetorical Wedge
Informal Logic, 2001 This essay explores Johnstone's idea that "rhetoric is a wedge." In particular, it explores the place of this idea in Johnstone's philosophy of argument, the need to confront this idea with argument, and ways of confronting it with ad rem and ad hominem ...
Mari Lee Mifsud
doaj +1 more source
Dissent and disparagement: Dealing with conflict and the pain of rejection in John
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 2021 This article addressed the issue of how the author of the Gospel according to John portrayed dissent, in particular, how the author had his protagonists respond to the experience of rejection by those typically designated as ‘the Jews’. Research thus far
William R.G. Loader
doaj +1 more source