Results 31 to 40 of about 16,929 (183)
It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks
The situationally disqualifying ad hominem attack is an argumentative move in critical dialogue whereby one participant points out certain features in his adversary's personal situation that are claimed to make it inappropriate for this adversary to ...
Erik C. W. Krabbe, Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
Naturalizing Logic: a case study of the ad hominem and implicit bias [PDF]
The fallacies, as traditionally conceived, are wrong ways of reasoning that nevertheless appear attractive to us. Recently, however, Woods (2013) has argued that they don’t merit such a title, and that what we take to be fallacies are instead largely ...
Ransom, Madeleine
core
The Passions of Christ in the Moral Theology of Thomas Aquinas: An Integrative Account [PDF]
In recent scholarship, moral theologians and readers of Thomas Aquinas have shown increasing sensitivity to the role of the passions in the moral life.
Clem, Stewart
core +1 more source
Everybody hurts: The Reviewer‐Imposed Pain (RIP) matrix
Abstract The peer review process supports authors by providing feedback on manuscripts from external, expert readers. However, not all reviews are supportive. Some reviews are just painful. But just how painful are they? In this study, we set out to validate a matrix describing the levels of pain authors experience in response to the sting of peer ...
Lara Varpio +3 more
wiley +1 more source
From 'scientific revolution' to 'unscientific revolution': an analysis of approaches to the history of generative linguistics [PDF]
This paper is devoted to the challenge that generative linguistics poses for linguistic historiography. As a first step, it presents a systematic overview of 19 approaches to the history of generative linguistics.
Aarsleff +98 more
core +1 more source
ABSTRACT Politicians from around the world are increasingly subject to harassment, with women disproportionately targeted. Recent changes in the sociopolitical landscape have influenced the nature and intensity of this harassment, with New Zealand being no exception. This qualitative study explores the experiences and impacts of harassment among female
Rhiannon Watson +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Whately on Arguments Involving Authority
Richard Whately’s views of arguments involving authority are very different in his Elements of Rhetoric and his Elements of Logic. This essay begins by documenting these differences and wondering why they are.
Hans V. Hansen
doaj +1 more source
The Deconversion of Harriet Martineau: An Emotional History of Unbelief
Conceptualising the ‘Victorian crisis of faith’ as a phenomenon fuelled by wider intellectual forces can only take us so far in our understanding of it. The loss of faith of many contemporaries did not merely entail an intellectual volte‐face, but also an affective impact. Scholarly accounts have been primarily written by privileging the role of ideas,
Petros Spanou
wiley +1 more source
Abstract Meta‐analyses have demonstrated how inoculation interventions increase the detection of misinformation, but their scalability has remained elusive. To address this, Study 1 (pre‐registered; N = 1,583) tested the efficacy of three short inoculation videos (prebunks) against three common manipulation tactics used in misinformation: (1 ...
Mikey Biddlestone +4 more
wiley +1 more source
Argotario: Computational Argumentation Meets Serious Games
An important skill in critical thinking and argumentation is the ability to spot and recognize fallacies. Fallacious arguments, omnipresent in argumentative discourse, can be deceptive, manipulative, or simply leading to `wrong moves' in a discussion ...
Gurevych, Iryna +5 more
core +1 more source

