Results 21 to 30 of about 16,929 (183)
Johnstone's View of Rhetorical and Dialectical Argument
Informal Logic, 2001 In the writings of Henry W. Johnstone, Jr. there can be found an evolving and gradually more sophisticated discussion of the relationship between rhetorical and dialectical argument. Johnstone's view on these matters was highly original, and at odds with
Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
Silence as an argument and a manifestation of respect in the argumentation in John Locke's works
Sententiae, 2019 In the article, referring to the method of rational reconstruction described by R. Rorty, an analysis of some works of J. Locke has been made in order to identify new prospects in John Locke's philosophy researches.
Olena Shcherbyna, Nataliia Shcherbyna
doaj +1 more source
Frontiers in Psychology, 2014 Argumentation is a crucial component of our lives. Although in the absence of rational debate our legal, political, and scientific systems would not be possible, there is still no integrated area of research on the psychology of argumentation ...
Marco eLillo-Unglaube +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Three Potential Problems for Powers' One-Fallacy Theory
Informal Logic, 2003 Lawrence Powers advocates a one-fallacy theory in which the only real fallacies are fallacies of ambiguity. He defines a fallacy, in general, as a bad argument that appears good.
Matthew Zuckero
doaj +1 more source
The Clinical Assessment in the Legal Field: An Empirical Study of Bias and Limitations in Forensic Expertise [PDF]
, 2015 According to the literature, psychological assessment in forensic contexts is one of the most controversial application areas for clinical psychology. This paper presents a review of systematic judgment errors in the forensic field.
Castelnuovo, Gianluca +3 more
core +2 more sources
Transcender les différends : une réaction possible aux situations de désaccord profond
Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 2012 Deep disagreement is a situation in which a conflict is so fundamental that there appears to be no underlying shared agreement by the arguers at any level. It is generally held that in such a case productive argument is not possible.
David Zarefsky
doaj +1 more source
The World Is Either Digital or Analogue [PDF]
, 2014 Peer ...
Berto, Francesco, Tagliabue, Jacopo
core +3 more sources
Rorty’s Promise in Metaethics [PDF]
, 2017 Little attention is given to Richard Rorty’s metaethical views. No doubt this stems from the fact that most commentators are more interested in his metaphilosophical views; most see his metaethical views, offered in scattered passages, as just the ...
Donelson, Raff
core +1 more source
Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication [PDF]
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 2018 Abstract In this paper, I contend that evidence-focused strategies of science communication may be complemented by possibly more effective rhetorical arguments in current public debates on vaccines. I analyse the case of direct science communication - that is, communication of evidence - and show that it is difficult to effectively ...
openaire +3 more sources
, 2011 The quality of our public discourse – think of the climate change debate for instance – is never very high. A day spent observing it reveals a litany of misrepresentation and error, argumentative fallacy, and a general lack of good will.
Steve, Matthews
core