Results 71 to 80 of about 35,376 (211)
Argotario: Computational Argumentation Meets Serious Games
, 2017 An important skill in critical thinking and argumentation is the ability to spot and recognize fallacies. Fallacious arguments, omnipresent in argumentative discourse, can be deceptive, manipulative, or simply leading to `wrong moves' in a discussion ...
Gurevych, Iryna +5 more
core +1 more source
The Pragmatics of Obscuring in Political Philosophy
Journal of Applied Philosophy, Volume 42, Issue 3, Page 1039-1058, July 2025.ABSTRACT According to the obscuring objection against mainstream political philosophy, there has been a long‐standing dominant research paradigm focusing on distributive justice. This has made it difficult to call attention to important social facts, such as discrimination and oppression.
Stina Björkholm, Nicolas Olsson Yaouzis
wiley +1 more source
In Defense of Alain Badiou [PDF]
, 2015 In lieu of an abstract, here are the article\u27s first two paragraphs: In Issue 107, Philosophy Now published James Alexander’s ‘A Refutation of Snails by Roast Beef\u27, an article decrying con temporary French philosopher Alain Badiou (b.l937 ...
Ruehl, Robert M.
core +1 more source
Metaphilosophy, Volume 56, Issue 3-4, Page 407-422, July 2025.Abstract Can you change sex? Can you change the meaning of the concept “sex”? Does changing “sex” make changing sex possible? Would changing “sex” to make changing sex not only possible but also easy be a good thing? Might it, as some argue, help us bring about a new way of thinking and of acting that liberates us from the logic of heteronormativity ...
Neil Gascoigne
wiley +1 more source
Johnstone's View of Rhetorical and Dialectical Argument
Informal Logic, 2001 In the writings of Henry W. Johnstone, Jr. there can be found an evolving and gradually more sophisticated discussion of the relationship between rhetorical and dialectical argument. Johnstone's view on these matters was highly original, and at odds with
Douglas Walton
doaj +1 more source
Fallacies in Ad Hominem Arguments [PDF]
, 2012 Arguments ad hominem are common in political debates, legal argumentation and everyday conversations. In this article, we propose a general definition of ad hominem arguments. An argument ad hominem is an argument that makes a claim about the reliability of a person in the performance of a certain function, based on some attribute relating to the ...
Christian Dahlman +2 more
openaire +1 more source
Anscombe on the shallowness of consequentialism
European Journal of Philosophy, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 737-747, June 2025.Abstract This paper is divided into two parts. In the first I outline and defend Elizabeth Anscombe's claim that consequentialism is a shallow philosophy by considering how two contemporary consequentialists reach opposing but equally outlandish moral conclusions on a matter as fundamental as whether it is good or bad that the human race continues.
Craig Taylor
wiley +1 more source
Studia Aurea: Revista de Literatura Española y Teoría Literaria del Renacimiento y Siglo de Oro, 2018 Dentro de la vasta obra de Lope, nos centramos en las sátiras ad hominem del Fénix para analizar un poco estudiado soneto que se le atribuye, «¿Qué humanos ojos quedarán enjutos?», respuesta a un poema homónimo de Góngora que data de c. 1611.
Antonio Sánchez Jiménez
doaj +1 more source
Argumentum Ad Hominem Mantık Yanılgısı
Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2021 Ad hominem argümanları, politik tartışmalarda, hukuki münakaşalarda ve günlük konuşmalarda oldukça yaygın bir şekilde yer almaktadır. Bunun bir mantık yanılgısı olarak ele alınmasının nedeni ise, bir kişinin ileri sürdüğü argümanın, açık bir şekilde, karşı tarafın karakteri, içinde bulunduğu koşulları, durumu veya davranışlarıyla çoğu kez alakasız ...
openaire +3 more sources