Detailed three-dimensional fault model of the 2022 M<sub>w</sub> 6.6 Luding earthquake reveals seismic hazard potential in the southeastern Tibetan plateau. [PDF]
Xu F +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Spatiotemporal evolution of crustal strains preceding destructive earthquakes using GNSS. [PDF]
Kamiyama M, Mikami A, Sawada Y, Akita H.
europepmc +1 more source
Deep intra-slab rupture and mechanism transition of the 2024 M<sub>w</sub> 7.4 Calama earthquake. [PDF]
Jia Z +10 more
europepmc +1 more source
Analysis of Aftershocks from California and Synthetic Series by Using Visibility Graph Algorithm. [PDF]
Muñoz-Diosdado A +3 more
europepmc +1 more source
Predictable recovery rates in near-surface materials after earthquake damage. [PDF]
Illien L +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
Occurrence of major earthquakes is as stochastic as smaller ones. [PDF]
Ghazoui Z +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Seismic versus aseismic slip for the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake doublet. [PDF]
Guo R +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Inhomogeneous spatio-temporal epidemic-type aftershock sequence model incorporating seismicity-triggering slow slip events. [PDF]
Bañales I +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Study on secondary collapse of the bottom frame masonry structure in semi-ruined state based on FEM-FDEM. [PDF]
Xu D, Sun F, Zhao H, Qi H, Chen L, Hu T.
europepmc +1 more source
Predicting largest expected aftershock ground motions using automated machine learning (AutoML)-based scheme. [PDF]
Yu X, Wang M, Ning C, Ji K.
europepmc +1 more source

