Results 11 to 20 of about 11,780 (189)

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta‐Analyses on Sleep Disorder Treatments Using AMSTAR 2 [PDF]

Brain and Behavior
Background: Meta‐analyses (MAs) provide up‐to‐date, quantified evidence on treatment effects, which may be useful for clinical and policy decision‐making. However, the quality of MAs varies, and methodological flaws can limit their reliability.
Leonard Ho, Yan Ling Kwok, Xi Chen, Irene X. Y. Wu, Chen Mao, Vincent Chi Ho Chung   +5 more
doaj   +5 more sources

A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2 [PDF]

Healthcare (Switzerland), 2020
Although earlier meta-analysis studies have provided evidence-based information useful for decision-making, debate regarding their quality continues. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of meta-analysis studies in the field of dance therapy (DT) using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and AMSTAR 2 assessment tools.
Hye-Ryeon Kim, Chang－Hwan Choi
exaly   +6 more sources

Editorial Perspective: Time for Another Grading System—From PRISMA to AMSTAR 2 [PDF]

Global Spine Journal, 2020
Jens R. Chapman
doaj   +5 more sources

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention studies in periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS tools. [PDF]

J Clin Exp Dent, 2023
Systematic reviews of intervention studies are used to support treatment recommendations. The aim of this study was to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of systematic reviews of intervention studies in in the field of periodontology using AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS.Systematic reviews of randomized and non-randomized clinical trials, published ...
Pereira AG, Martins CC, Campos JR, Faria SF, Notaro SQ, Poklepović-Peričić T, Costa LC, Costa FO, Cota LO.   +8 more
europepmc   +7 more sources

Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study [PDF]

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2023
High-quality systematic reviews (SRs) can strengthen the evidence base for prevention and health promotion. A 16-item AMSTAR 2 tool allows the appraisal of SRs by deriving a confidence rating in their results.
Karina Karolina Kedzior, Katja Matthias
exaly   +3 more sources

A Russian version of AMSTAR 2: validation and guidance

Эпидемиология и вакцинопрофилактика, 2022
Relevance. Determining the quality of a systematic review is known to be of the main criteria to consider when making a clinical decision. And various assessment tools allow you to determine this, both for the readers themselves and for those who write a
D. V. Kvashnina, R. V. Polibin, N. V. Saperkin, A. V. Svetlichnaja, N. V. Torchinskij   +4 more
doaj   +2 more sources

Moving towards accurate and transparent AMSTAR 2 ratings and correcting the record on Cochrane reviews [PDF]

BMC Medical Research Methodology
Juan Victor Ariel Franco, Jae Hung Jung
doaj   +4 more sources

Personalizing Prophylactic Radiotherapy for Hip Heterotopic Ossification: An AMSTAR-2 Compliant Review of Meta-analyses. [PDF]

In Vivo
Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty. Various prophylactic treatments have been proposed, including radiotherapy (RT). This review summarizes the evidence from meta-analyses on the efficacy of RT in preventing hip HO.A literature search was conducted on PubMed.
Galietta E, Gaiani L, Giannini C, Sambri A, Buwenge M, Macchia G, Deodato F, Cilla S, Strigari L, Arcelli A, Fiore M, Cammelli S, DE Paolis M, Morganti AG.   +13 more
europepmc   +7 more sources

Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention in dentistry published between 2019-2020 using the AMSTAR 2 tool

Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2022
Introduction The number of systematic reviews (SRs) in dentistry published each year has grown considerably, and they have been essential in clinical decision-making and health policy.Objective The objective is to critically appraise SRs of intervention in dentistry using the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2' (AMSTAR 2) tool published
Patrícia, Pauletto, Helena, Polmann, Jéssica Conti, Réus, Júlia Meller Dias, de Oliveira, Débora, Chaves, Karyn, Lehmkuhl, Carla, Massignan, Cristine Miron, Stefani, Carolina Castro, Martins, Carlos, Flores-Mir, Graziela, De Luca Canto   +10 more
openaire   +3 more sources

Bewertung der methodischen Qualität systematischer Übersichtsarbeiten mit AMSTAR 2

, 2020
Beschreibung: Die Bewertung der methodischen Qualität systematischer Übersichtsarbeiten muss vielfach durchgeführt werden, wie z.B. in Leitlinien oder Overviews. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) war bis vor einigen Jahren das am häufigsten verwendete Instrument[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]
Pieper, D, Matthias, K, Jacobs, A, Wegewitz, U   +3 more
openaire   +3 more sources