Results 31 to 40 of about 9,659 (165)

Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2022
Background Systematic reviews of in-vitro studies, like any other study, can be of heterogeneous quality. The present study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies.
Christopher Hammel, Nikolaos Pandis, Dawid Pieper, Clovis Mariano Faggion   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health

Sichuan jingshen weisheng, 2022
ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of systematic review / Meta analysis （SR/MA） of intervention randomized controlled trial （RCT） published in the Sichuan Mental Health.MethodsThe literature databases such as Wanfang Data， China National ...
Che Peng, Hu Jun, Tang Xueli, Huang Ke, Li Linguo, Yin Chunyan   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021
Background Systematic Reviews (SRs) can build the groundwork for evidence-based health care decision-making. A sound methodological quality of SRs is crucial.
Stefanie Bühn, Peggy Ober, Tim Mathes, Uta Wegewitz, Anja Jacobs, Dawid Pieper   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in dentistry including animal studies: a cross-sectional study

Irish Veterinary Journal, 2023
Background The overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews including animal models can be heterogeneous. We assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews including animal models in dentistry as well as the overall confidence in ...
Max C. Menne, Naichuan Su, Clovis M. Faggion   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Reporting and methodological quality of systematic literature reviews evaluating the associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking behaviors: a systematic quality review

Harm Reduction Journal, 2021
Introduction Several published systematic reviews have examined the potential associations between e-cigarette use and cigarette smoking, but their methodological and/or reporting quality have not yet been assessed.
Mimi M. Kim, Lynley Pound, Isabella Steffensen, Geoffrey M. Curtin   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). [PDF]

PLoS ONE, 2007
BACKGROUND: Thousands of systematic reviews have been conducted in all areas of health care. However, the methodological quality of these reviews is variable and should routinely be appraised.
Beverley J Shea, Lex M Bouter, Joan Peterson, Maarten Boers, Neil Andersson, Zulma Ortiz, Tim Ramsay, Annie Bai, Vijay K Shukla, Jeremy M Grimshaw   +9 more
doaj   +1 more source

Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

International Journal of General Medicine, 2022
Liuying Li,1 Lanying Yang,2 Biao Luo,2 Lvyu Deng,2 Yue Zhong,2 Daohui Gan,2 Xiaohan Wu,2 Peimin Feng,1 Fengya Zhu2 1Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China; 2Traditional Chinese Medicine ...
Li L, Yang L, Luo B, Deng L, Zhong Y, Gan D, Wu X, Feng P, Zhu F   +8 more
doaj  

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery—How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review

Global Spine Journal, 2021
Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery over the past 2 decades.
Muthu Sathish MS Ortho,, Ramakrishnan Eswar MBBS   +1 more
doaj   +1 more source

Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study

Frontiers in Medicine, 2021
Background: We sought to investigate the methodological and reporting quality of published systematic reviews describing randomized controlled trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus and analyze their association with status of protocol registration.Methods ...
Qiuyi Zheng, Qiuyi Zheng, Fenghua Lai, Bin Li, Jia Xu, Jianyan Long, Sui Peng, Yanbing Li, Yihao Liu, Yihao Liu, Haipeng Xiao   +10 more
doaj   +1 more source

Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR

BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2018
Background Systematic reviews (SRs) in the field of neuropathic pain (NeuP) are increasingly important for decision-making. However, methodological flaws in SRs can reduce the validity of conclusions.
Svjetlana Dosenovic, Antonia Jelicic Kadic, Katarina Vucic, Nikolina Markovina, Dawid Pieper, Livia Puljak   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source