Results 31 to 40 of about 11,780 (189)

Results of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.

open access: yes, 2022
Results of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.
Brenda S. Bauer (12569129)   +4 more
core   +1 more source

Methodological assessment of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies

open access: yesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2022
Background Systematic reviews of in-vitro studies, like any other study, can be of heterogeneous quality. The present study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of systematic reviews of in-vitro dental studies.
Christopher Hammel   +3 more
doaj   +1 more source

Result of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.

open access: yes, 2022
Result of the AMSTAR-2 assessments.
Ruijuan Han (13114859)   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or Meta-analyses of intervention randomized controlled trials published in the Sichuan Mental Health

open access: yesSichuan jingshen weisheng, 2022
ObjectiveTo evaluate the methodological quality of systematic review / Meta analysis (SR/MA) of intervention randomized controlled trial (RCT) published in the Sichuan Mental Health.MethodsThe literature databases such as Wanfang Data, China National ...
Che Peng   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Critical analysis of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of antibiotics in third molar surgeries using AMSTAR 2. [PDF]

open access: yesJ Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2020
The clinicians usually prescribe antibiotics to reduce post-operative complications during third molar surgeries. However, in the absence of clear conclusions regarding the use of antibiotics in third molar surgeries, present systematic review was planned to assess the quality of systematic reviews evaluating the efficiency of antibiotics in reducing ...
Chugh A   +5 more
europepmc   +5 more sources

AMSTAR-2 items and frequency of responses.

open access: yes, 2022
AMSTAR-2 items and frequency of responses.
Ali Khan (568900)   +11 more
core   +1 more source

Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools

open access: yesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021
Background Systematic Reviews (SRs) can build the groundwork for evidence-based health care decision-making. A sound methodological quality of SRs is crucial.
Stefanie Bühn   +5 more
doaj   +1 more source

Quality of Systematic Reviews with Network Meta-Analyses on JAK Inhibitors in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Application of the AMSTAR 2 Scale. [PDF]

open access: yesJ Clin Med
Background/Objective: Systematic reviews (SRs) with network meta-analysis (NMA) support evidence-based decision-making by enabling both direct and indirect comparisons across multiple interventions. Given the expanding use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the methodological rigor of SRs with NMA is essential for ...
Ramalho B   +3 more
europepmc   +4 more sources

AMSTAR 2 assessment of the included systematic reviews.

open access: yes, 2023
AMSTAR 2 assessment of the included systematic reviews.
Renan Souza (8709633)   +5 more
core   +1 more source

Methodological quality of systematic reviews in dentistry including animal studies: a cross-sectional study

open access: yesIrish Veterinary Journal, 2023
Background The overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews including animal models can be heterogeneous. We assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews including animal models in dentistry as well as the overall confidence in ...
Max C. Menne   +2 more
doaj   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy